God exists! it says so in the bible and theres proof because they found noahs ark.
imaplanck. said:God exists! it says so in the bible and theres proof because they found noahs ark.
Or:Lawdog said:We can be certain that God exists because the Roman Catholic Church says so. (The Church says that we can be certain).
Or:No scientific evidence needs to, or can be, or should be produced.
.Only the Church has the right, given by God himself,
to make authoritative pronouncements concerning the divine reality
Or:The Church also affirms that the human mind is capable of concluding, through various evidences, that God exists.
Or:However, to try and prove or disprove God from a scientific standpoint is useless and vain.
Or:The role of Science is not to be a philosophical ground,
but an instrument of coming to knowledge about the physical reality.
Or:God is pure spirit, therefore Science can never make a certain conclusion concerning God.
Lawdog said:We can be certain that God exists because the Roman Catholic Church says so. (The Church says that we can be certain).
No scientific evidence needs to, or can be, or should be produced.
Only the Church has the right, given by God himself,
to make authoritative pronouncements concerning the divine reality.
The Church also affirms that the human mind is capable of concluding, through various evidences, that God exists.
However, to try and prove or disprove God from a scientific standpoint is useless and vain.
The role of Science is not to be a philosophical ground,
but an instrument of coming to knowledge about the physical reality.
God is pure spirit, therefore Science can never make a certain conclusion concerning God.
nubianconcubine said:did they? last i heard they found wood that was dated waaaaay after the period noah's ark was supposed to have landed. i heard recently that they found petrified wood high in the mountains but not on mt. ararat.
KennyJC said:nubianconcubine:
Delusion means to believe in spite of zero evidence. This fits you, lightgigantic and our friend Lawdog down to the ground. And no it's not funny, I am apalled.
Evidence?
Evidence?
Evidence?
If you can not provide any evidence you are suffering from a superstitious delusion. That is inescapable.
He is right, the chances of life happening by accident is about 1-1000, far too much to be by chance, there had to be an intelligent designer in the 3000 years of earths existence. Is that proof enough for you? I think you will have no argument left!Enterprise-D said:Rickie: It's a good thing that it's just your opinion, because obviously your strength is not in the field of probability.
You are correct in stating that the probabilities of Earth evolving to even a pre-intelligencia state are very unlikely. But you underestimate the timespan. Did you ever hear of the (para)phrase "Given infinite time, a number of monkeys with a number of typewriters will eventually produce the works of Shakespeare"? Admittedly an over-simplified and ridiculous metaphorical parallel of my point...
The amount of time that has passed in Earth's existence has seen enough permutations of chemical, cellular and energetic reactions that give MUCH more credence to evolution than you would like to portray.
Added to which, and I'm sure it's stated before so I won't go into detail, enough evidence exists to bolster the theory of evolution.
Faith is not a prerequisite of believing evolution. Logical thinking is.
imaplanck. said:He is right, the chances of life happening by accident is about 1-1000, far too much to be by chance, there had to be an intelligent designer in the 3000 years of earths existence. Is that proof enough for you? I think you will have no argument left!
He is right, the chances of life happening by accident is about 1-1000, far too much to be by chance, there had to be an intelligent designer in the 3000 years of earths existence. Is that proof enough for you? I think you will have no argument left!
The joke's on you! He was being sarcastic.Godless said:Ain't a pitty fools like these keep showing up here, spewing their bs so that rational people can ridicule the hell of out of them.
Try to use your brain for an instance. yada yada etc etc
Godless
baumgarten said:The joke's on you! He was being sarcastic.
imaplanck. said:How do you know?
When god created the earth, the people, the animals and the trees 3000 years ago he didn't make it so you could tell. YOU ARE BEING BRAINWASHED!
Also it's not sure that the bible says noahs ark ended up on mount ararat it says it could have ended up high in the mountains if you read it right.
God loves all!
nONE of that has been proven it's just a guess, you are being brainwashed to believe you cant be wrong!Provita said:My God, Why Did U Create Such Morons???!?!!!?!
EVOLUTION DOES NOT DISPROVE GOD'S EXISTENCE
THE BIG BANG DOES NOT EITHER
NOR THE PROVEN FACT THAT THE WORLD IS 4.4 BILLION YEARS OLD (thats by memory, might be wrong)
GET OVER URSELVES AND GET A BRAIN
Enterprise-D said:Rickie: It's a good thing that it's just your opinion, because obviously your strength is not in the field of probability.
You are correct in stating that the probabilities of Earth evolving to even a pre-intelligencia state are very unlikely. But you underestimate the timespan. Did you ever hear of the (para)phrase "Given infinite time, a number of monkeys with a number of typewriters will eventually produce the works of Shakespeare"? Admittedly an over-simplified and ridiculous metaphorical parallel of my point...
The amount of time that has passed in Earth's existence has seen enough permutations of chemical, cellular and energetic reactions that give MUCH more credence to evolution than you would like to portray.
Added to which, and I'm sure it's stated before so I won't go into detail, enough evidence exists to bolster the theory of evolution.
Faith is not a prerequisite of believing evolution. Logical thinking is.
You're still looking at it the wrong way. You're looking at the end product and asking what the chances were that gave rise to it - which in your mind is staggering.Rickie said:Hey enterprise-d, love your pic, i love star trek. I think you misunderstood what i was saying, i wasn't talking about evolution. I'm not saying i believe it didn't happen. what i'm saying is that, in my opinion, the odds of this planet coming into existence with all the things that are nessesary to sustain life (let alone our fragile existence), and that includes all the things needed for evolution to occure, are staggering, and people say its by fluke? I don't understand that myself.
Sarkus said:You're still looking at it the wrong way. You're looking at the end product and asking what the chances were that gave rise to it - which in your mind is staggering.
But... (and I've used this example before)...
Shuffle a deck of cards.
Deal them out face up, one by one, and record the order in which they are revealed - all 52 of them.
The way you're looking at it - looking at the end product - the order of those cards - and say "Wow - what was the chance they would end up in that order?".
The answer is roughly 1 in 10^68 (or 1 with 68 zeroes after it).
Staggering.
And yet you did it - just by dealing the cards.
Your way of looking at it only holds if we were chosen as the "end product" before the cards got shuffled and dealt.
If you choose an order for the cards BEFORE you deal them, then yes, the chance of you being right is 1 in 10^68.
But we, humans, weren't chosen before the Earth began.
We are just a product of the way it has gone.