No, they sound like well tested and supported theories, with sound experimental evidence to back them up. Predictions are made from them, new things inferred from them, and new things discovered.
I will admit that the word "law" doesn't imply something that's contestable, but for this subject, especially as regards physics, time, and the nature of space and gravity, it very well may be. I support the possibility of human understanding of the universe (and other things) as being deficient. That's just my opinion, but I think it's unreasonable to assume that our models of the nature of the universe are complete and infallible. That's an understatement, actually. It would be foolish and arrogant to say we've gone as far as we can go. I'm sure I could find several examples of Science and experts making absolute pronouncements on various subjects, and having them turn out to be completely wrong.
So what do you think of the accounts that mention anal probing? Are these accounts fakes?
I must confess that I don't hear that much about anal probing. First I ever heard about it was from Whitley Strieber. Apparently it happens to other people, but mostly I hear references ad nauseam as a cheap joke. It's not foremost in my mind.
Eh? Explanation, please?
What about that guy (Rael/ Claude Vorilhon) who claims to have made love to alien females to repopulate their race?
Mr. Vorilhon is indeed interesting. I am familiar with his pseudo-religious organization. I might call it a cult, judging by what I have seen of him and his followers. He may well have had an encounter in the Alps or whatever he originally claimed, meeting with "Jehovah" and all that. I honestly don't really care about them. I have a personal rule of taking charismatic sect leaders with several grains of salt.
All have merit? Or, are you actually going to show some discernment and discount the more ludicrous stuff?
Since when did I ever advise to throw discernment to the wind? Did I ever say that?
Remember that way back on the first or second page of this thread, I stated that ufology was a legitimate subject worthy of study. You immediately implied that the very notion was crazy, and now you seem to be saying that ufology requires belief in all manner of this and that and that it's just a crazy melting pot.
Why do I have to apologize for anyone and every thing that claims UFOs and/or aliens as their mantles?
I can't wait to hear what insulting madness you'll come up with to shove in my face.
Then all we are left debating is what crosses the line of 'ludicrous', aren't we?
:thumbsup: You're so cool!
Because the reports do not fit a motive, that's why. Don't cop out and say we cannot think like Aliens, intelligence is intelligence, no matter what creature possesses it.
Cop out, eh?
All intelligence is intelligence?
All humans think like all other humans? All humans eat meat? All humans listen to the same music? Laugh at the same jokes? Find the same people attractive? Find the opposite sex attractive? Vote for the same politicians? Hold the same political ideals and doctrines? All Americans love football? Ice cream? Ronald McDonald?
All people care about what goes on above our heads? Care about UFOs, and all other paranormal subjects?
Everyone is interested in what everyone else is interested in? No one has independent thought? No one ever plots against other people, while telling those people that it's all in their own best interest?
Yeah. Intelligence is intelligence. Really. :wtf:
Abducting the same weirdo yank over and over again gets them what, exactly?
Yank as in YANKEE? As in American?
Oh, you won't be drawn, because you don't have an answer, and you don't have an aswer because it would grate with the theories.
And
you have an answer I'm sure. Does it have to do with intelligence = intelligence?
Grate with what theories?
So they are invisible, but some people can see them? You aren't sounding very rational at this point, btw.
I'm only saying it's very possible that they can hide themselves completely when they feel like it, based on my own knowledge of UFOs.
Your definition of rational is...