Marc,
All atheists are narrow minded.
An agnostic is an open minded person.
People like muscleman are open minded.
From Webster –
Open-minded - : receptive to arguments or ideas.
Narrow-minded - : lacking in tolerance or breadth of vision : PETTY.
The theist has only one answer – a god did it.
The typical atheist says the theist answer isn’t convincing and there may be alternatives.
The strong atheist says there is no god, there must be other reasons for the universe and life.
The agnostic says that it is not possible to know the nature of a god so no comment is possible.
It is not difficult to see that
the theist has the most limited and narrow view of anyone. For the theist there is only the one single view, every other idea has been excluded from their minds.
The typical atheist is the most open-minded since he holds no limitations of what might be possible. While he does not find the theist argument convincing he is quite wiling to accept it if adequate proof is provided. Otherwise the atheist usually focuses on ongoing scientific research in the hope of discovering new ideas and knowledge. I.e. is fully receptive to arguments and ideas.
Whatsupmascleman of course, apart from having only the one single thought (god did it), also shows excessive lack of tolerance for other ideas and much prefers to use profanities and childish name calling. Open-minded? You must be joking, either that or you are blind.
So I suggest you considerably review your quite erroneous perception of what it means to be open-minded or narrow-minded. When you take a theist perspective you have tied yourself entirely to an extremely narrow minded position.
Also, name calling of this nature is somewhat immature if you are serious about a respectful debate. I’ve set the record straight here, but you certainly earn no respect for pointless name-calling.
The heavy condescending sarcasm also makes you look immature as well. Do you have anything useful to say or do you just want to irritate everyone?
