lol I eat very little meat. I'm not a meat-eater as I don't like the taste of it very much. But I believe I have to eat a bit of meat every once in a while. I am not eating meat for fun. The last time I ate meat was last Sunday and that was a tiny piece.
So your accusations concerning my "frivolous dietary and decorative preferences" is completely ridiculous.
If you're asserting that you need animal flesh to survive, you still have all of your work ahead of you.
But all the above is irrelevant really. Even if I was eating meat for fun, it does not mean I am killing animals for fun. They are two completely different things.
What about ethical chain of custody? If you hire a hitman to kill someone and bring back the flesh of the deceased for your consumption, you are guilty of a contract killing and are regarded as a principal in the offence, and are subject to the same conviction and penalties as the actual killer. There is no legal or ethical distinction made between them, nor any exception.
Cognitive dissonance, however, enables convenient, but invalid, exceptions in the case of war and meat-eating.