How can a poster know what will be deemed as pornography?

[Trippy]

Trippy are you well?
I didn't ask Billvon questions like that? I just asked if he thought it was pornographic. That is all I'll say on the topic at the moment as I'm still in communication with Kittamaru on the subject.

What are you on about???

I answered your question.

 

[Robittybob1]

What are you on about???

I answered your question.

Like are you well? I was just wondering if you are comprehending OK. I often get told that I'm missing the point, and maybe my English isn't the best.
But did you note that I asked Billvon a question about pornography not whether he was sexually aroused? I was wondering if you were well enough to know the difference in the two questions? Do you think it is one and the same question or is it two different questions?

 

[leopold]

rob,
why is it important to you to have pornography defined on this board?

 

[Captain Kremmen]

Here's the dictionary definition:

Pornography
pɔːˈnɒgrəfi/Submit
noun
1.
printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate sexual excitement.


Now.
I suppose Robbity that your real question is why your pornography got you a ban, and other people got away with it?

Most people realise that when they post something of this nature that they are risking a ban or at least a warning.
If the material is mild, or justifiable in context, and they don't do it continually, it will probably be tolerated.
If they get a warning, or other indications that people find it offensive,
they will back off and watch what they post for a few weeks until the heat is off.
It isn't a matter of rules, it is social interaction.

Most people, given the issues which have arisen recently, would, in your position, have been more circumspect.
The fact that you can't understand why, says more about yourself than it does about the Forum's standards.

 

[leopold]

it all boils down to good taste and what the mods decide.
if the mods decide it's porn then you're basically screwed.
so stop pushing, k?

rob,
did you really tell bells what sexually aroused you?
you fucking perverted dumbass.
she's married you moron.

 

[Bells]

it all boils down to good taste and what the mods decide.
if the mods decide it's porn then you're basically screwed.
so stop pushing, k?

rob,
did you really tell bells what sexually aroused you?
you fucking perverted dumbass.
she's married you moron.

Whether I am married or not is beside the point.

You don't PM people or tell complete strangers stuff like that.

Boundaries and just common sense.. both of which he is lacking.

Despite repeated attempts to explain it to him, it's not just the video, but the fact that for several posts, he was going into detail about what gets him off and was quite explicit about it, not to mention his comments to Beer, which were wholly inappropriate and unacceptable. Sure, on its own it could be taken as being double meaning, but he immediately followed it up with several posts about what turns him on, including a video he openly admitted to making him sexually aroused, and then commenting how he likes anal porn and several other comments..

No, really..

And he doesn't understand why he was banned?

Going back to posts from years and years ago and saying 'this is then porn'.. he completely ignores the contexts of his posts and his repeatedly going on and on in such a way as to make everyone uncomfortable and frankly disgusted because he just wouldn't shut up about it.

Then he gets back from his ban and between his posts in the forum and his perverted PM's to me, here we are.

And he still does not get it. He goes so far as to say that it would be easier if he could just tell who is a woman and who is a man on this site. Again.. Completely misses the point. Who would it be easier on? The women he would then stalk? Or the men he would disregard or perhaps discuss his sexual fantasies with? If you ever wondered why forums rarely demand that people post their sex, Robittybob1 is a prime example. He fails to notice that men and women are equally disgusted by his posts and comments. And he again completely does not get the point that it is inappropriate and why. Just like his acting surprised when I became angry at that last PM he sent me. Because he believes that because it is by PM, then he can do so. He doesn't get why it is not appropriate or acceptable. Then he goes that I didn't tell him no or to stop. Apparently my saying.. repeatedly.. that it is not acceptable was not enough of an indication? Does he require sky writing? Perhaps tattooed on his forehead? What part of 'you can't post that crap here' does not mean 'stop' exactly?

Just look at his comment to Billvon. Double meaning and in the context of what we are discussing... It's obvious how he meant it and it is obvious how it would come across. For him to then turn around and say 'well I didn't ask if it aroused him'.. Perhaps he believes we are all stupid and cannot see his blatant disingenuous dishonesty?

 

[Robittybob1]

rob,
why is it important to you to have pornography defined on this board?

As you'd know I was banned for posting a link to a YT, that was part of my Christian Songs thread. I knew it was up there but I didn't think it exceeded the limit. I am writing about my life story and how God is involved and for sure sex seems to be a part of it, for I am a single man trying to understand the proper Christian way of meeting a partner. I needed to be able to discuss things and not get banned for it, so I wrote to James R prior to this banning, and he said it was OK to discuss weird dreams, but later Bells said no it is not. So I am just a bit uncertain as to whether I should proceed until it is clarified.

 

[Robittybob1]

Here's the dictionary definition:

Pornography
pɔːˈnɒgrəfi/Submit
noun
1.
printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate sexual excitement.


Now.
I suppose Robbity that your real question is why your pornography got you a ban, and other people got away with it?

Most people realise that when they post something of this nature that they are risking a ban or at least a warning.
If the material is mild, or justifiable in context, and they don't do it continually, it will probably be tolerated.
If they get a warning, or other indications that people find it offensive,
they will back off and watch what they post for a few weeks until the heat is off.
It isn't a matter of rules, it is social interaction.

Most people, given the issues which have arisen recently, would, in your position, have been more circumspect.
The fact that you can't understand why, says more about yourself than it does about the Forum's standards.

By that definition any weird dream would always be OK then for I would be most surprised if telling it "intended to stimulate sexual excitement".
By the above definition given the YT was OK then, for there was nothing of this category: "printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity"
There was nothing in it that came close to that. (Well it came "close" but it always changed just at the right time not to enter that definition.) I admit it teased but was it pornography by the definition of porngraphy, and I don't believe it was.

Removal of the link or pictures should be the first call of action by the moderators for then we get to know, how they are defining pornography.

 

[Bells]

I said that it is not acceptable to discuss your sexual dreams and sexual fantasies and what turns you on, etc, on this site.

Weird dreams is one thing. Going into lurid details about what makes you aroused and your sexual dreams.. No.

As I explained to you, I have known James for around 12 years on this site. There is no way in hell that James would have said yes, you could post that.

The fact that he banned you for it should be a good enough indication.

If you want or "need" to discuss these things, then start a blog.

But it is not acceptable on this site. How is this difficult for you to understand? You were even banned for your behaviour. And you still don't get it..? How can you still refuse to respect that?

And frankly, what does your meeting women have to do with this site? IT'S A SCIENCE DISCUSSION SITE. Not a dating site. Nor is it a site that offers relationship advice or advice on the proper Christian way to meet women (I'll give you a hint on that one, it isn't acceptable to Christians to stalk women or discuss what sexually arouses you). And it is not a site where you can get your rocks off stalking women and telling them about what turns you on. Who the hell does that? And posting it all in a thread about Christian songs as well no less.

You have a problem.

It is not us. It is not this site.

It is you.

Get some professional help.

 

[Robittybob1]

it all boils down to good taste and what the mods decide.
if the mods decide it's porn then you're basically screwed.
so stop pushing, k?

rob,
did you really tell bells what sexually aroused you?
you fucking perverted dumbass.
she's married you moron.

Look I can't remember the exact wording in the PMs but I am willing, and I have said it, Bells can put the entire PM on the forum so you can all read the entire and actual context anything was said. I don't think I said anything too weird, that is why I think posting my letter will be OK, but it must be in full with her questions to me as well.

 

[Bells]

By that definition any weird dream would always be OK then for I would be most surprised if telling it "intended to stimulate sexual excitement".
By the above definition given the YT was OK then, for there was nothing of this category: "printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity"
There was nothing in it that came close to that. (Well it came "close" but it always changed just at the right time not to enter that definition.) I admit it teased but was it pornography by the definition of porngraphy, and I don't believe it was.

Removal of the link or pictures should be the first call of action by the moderators for then we get to know, how they are defining pornography.

The fact he banned you for it and removed your link is not enough of a definition for you?

Jesus Mary Joseph, your dishonesty knows no bounds.

You are actually going to try to claim that a youtube video did not meet the category of the direct definition of pornography?

What you posted was not acceptable on this site. Why? Because it was pornographic and crossed the line.

Do you understand now?

Has it entered your thick skull?

You want to post or discuss porn? Do it elsewhere.

You are not allowed to do that on this site.

If you persist, you will be banned.

Have I made it clear enough for you yet?

Or do I need to demonstrate it with banning you again? Because right now, you have gone so far out of bounds of acceptability on this site, I don't think anyone will protest banning you permanently, let alone sending you away for a couple of weeks.

 

[(Q)]

I am a single man trying to understand the proper Christian way of meeting a partner.

FYI, stalking females on an internet forum is NOT the way to meet a partner. Posting pornographic videos only serves to show you're a pervert that doesn't deserve a partner.

 

[Robittybob1]

I said that it is not acceptable to discuss your sexual dreams and sexual fantasies and what turns you on, etc, on this site.

Weird dreams is one thing. Going into lurid details about what makes you aroused and your sexual dreams.. No.

As I explained to you, I have known James for around 12 years on this site. There is no way in hell that James would have said yes, you could post that.

The fact that he banned you for it should be a good enough indication.

If you want or "need" to discuss these things, then start a blog.

But it is not acceptable on this site. How is this difficult for you to understand? You were even banned for your behaviour. And you still don't get it..? How can you still refuse to respect that?

And frankly, what does your meeting women have to do with this site? IT'S A SCIENCE DISCUSSION SITE. Not a dating site. Nor is it a site that offers relationship advice or advice on the proper Christian way to meet women (I'll give you a hint on that one, it isn't acceptable to Christians to stalk women or discuss what sexually arouses you). And it is not a site where you can get your rocks off stalking women and telling them about what turns you on. Who the hell does that? And posting it all in a thread about Christian songs as well no less.

You have a problem.

It is not us. It is not this site.

It is you.

Get some professional help.

Now Bells OK so it was James who banned me. OK but look, the dreams will not be anything like the YT. So I will write my dream posts and get them vetted by a moderator before they get posted then should I.
I just want to be able proceed but not to be interrupted by bannings.

 

[(Q)]

Being a young lad how did you feel about the cheerleader photo? Was it pornographic to you?

Will you be masturbating while reading such an answer?

 

[Robittybob1]

You want to post or discuss porn? Do it elsewhere.

You are not allowed to do that on this site.

If you persist, you will be banned.

Have I made it clear enough for you yet?

Or do I need to demonstrate it with banning you again? Because right now, you have gone so far out of bounds of acceptability on this site, I don't think anyone will protest banning you permanently, let alone sending you away for a couple of weeks.

Bells please, by "persist" you mean persist in this discussion? Now that is weird. For this discussion is very healthy.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

Personally, I quite liked the cheerleader.
But details of Robbity's masturbatory fantasies, or anybody else's, I can definitely do without.

 

[Robittybob1]

Personally, I quite liked the cheerleader.
But details of Robbity's masturbatory fantasies, Those I can definitely do without.

Would I? I have been asked not to say what I like etc so you should also be careful about saying what you like and dislike. Surely I'm not being singled out here again.
It was strange how it picked up that additional thought! Say if you want it deleted?

 

[Captain Kremmen]

I understand how the site works.
I know what is allowable and what isn't, and when and by how much I can break the rules.
So does anyone who has been on here more than a week or two.
People don't need a set of rules. They learn through interaction.

On the other hand, even though you have been here a long time,
you don't "get it". It's a mystery to you, isn't it?
That's why you are looking for a set of rules.
There isn't such a thing, and there never will be.

Re. previous post:
You replied as I was changing my post below.
I realised on reading it that referring to you specifically was unfair, and altered it to make it a general comment.

 

[Bells]

Look I can't remember the exact wording in the PMs but I am willing, and I have said it, Bells can put the entire PM on the forum so you can all read the entire and actual context anything was said. I don't think I said anything too weird, that is why I think posting my letter will be OK, but it must be in full with her questions to me as well.

Lets post your PM and my response to you, shall I?

Here is my response to your PM to me, your original post can be found at the bottom of my post, in full. Your PM to me was in response to something I posted in the forum, which addressed the hypocrisy your comments about your stereotyping all atheists as liars because atheists do not believe in God, and therefore, in your opinion, we have nothing to fear so we apparently lie. The hypocrisy I commented on was because of how you posted you'd had affairs, etc and then had the nerve to stereotype all atheists as liars.

Now, you decided to PM me your response to my post on the forum - after you simply copied and pasted, without any formatting of my post.. Please note, to protect people's privacy, I removed your real name which for some reason, you felt the need to sign your PM's to me with your real name and I also removed your mention of other members names on this site - who were not involved in your discussion about the issue on the forum). Your PM:

Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
"Like you know why you used these words in the current quoted post. Whether I believe them or not, doesn't matter for you know what you intended. Just like when I deliberately write posts with double meanings, allowing you to choose whichever meaning you think I'm saying. But in the end it told me what I had wanted to know; that is whether you were male or female and you revealed yourself (unless you were meaning to deceive all of us).
But Bells confirmed it, so I'm fairly certain. So you were finally outed after 3 years of picking on me, after 3 years I found you."
I'm sorry, what did I confirm?

Let me reiterate something for you Robittybob1, so we are very very clear and so you stop spraying this across the site and cross posting constantly.

You were banned for posting inappropriate material on this site.



Why are atheists finding telling the 100% truth so difficult? I can see it, since there is no "God" to punish them, there is no incentive to tell the truth, for lying is more profitable and convenient. But then how can they claim to be moral? What morals are they talking about?
Atheism is when there is no God to stop one from lying. So are you a theist or an atheist?
Bullshit.

Tell me, were you a theist when you were dating 3 women and having an affair with a married woman? Or were you just a bastard who was taking advantage of women?

You are going on this manic rant about how apparently atheists lie because they do not believe in a God that would punish us if we lie. Which is total and utter bullshit. So stop stereotyping and stop trolling this site with your personal issues.

If you have a complaint about moderation, then I would suggest you take it to the appropriate sub-forum and cease and desist in trolling threads in the religious sub-forum with your complaints and stereotyping.

For a guy who posted porn on this site, stalked a fellow member and wouldn't back off when requested, you have to be kidding yourself if you are going to try to lecture anyone here about morality. Unless of course you are going to claim you were moral when you dated 3 women at once and had an affair with a married woman? Where was your moral center when you did that, I wonder?"

My answer to your post:

You know i dispute that the post was pornographic. How can i show it wasn't? It is just up to a moderator to say it is and you're done. There was no warning or debate. And I've shown today the same thread had other terrible material posted in it and that was just ignored. How can i tell what is acceptable? Now I have a letter from James saying I can post what I like from my dreams etc. for I wanted to clear up the preaching issue, but some of the dreams are pretty weird sexually as well so I need to run that past him as well.

I got a 3 day banning for the "Pornography" and that was followed by a 7 day banning for the "sock puppets". I think the letters confirming this are in my inbox.

"I'm sorry, what did I confirm?" By implication you confirmed that BW/S is female. I had no previous idea.

"Tell me, were you a theist when you were dating 3 women and having an affair with a married woman? Or were you just a bastard who was taking advantage of women?" Well I was single male on NZ Dating and there happened to be a few interested all at once and I had to try and work out what to do.
Yes I was a theist at the time. Multiple dating is not a crime as far as I know.

The affair with the married woman really messed me up, but somehow the Lord did not stop it.

"You are going on this manic rant about how apparently atheists lie because they do not believe in a God that would punish us if we lie. Which is total and utter bullshit. So stop stereotyping and stop trolling this site with your personal issues."
So would you be willing to only ever tell me the truth? I think you do come close to it. But would you promise that to me?

Regards
[your real name removed]

So I get this in my PM inbox.

And I responded by addressing each of your points. I also left your PM in full, quoted at the bottom of my response to you as well.

I am going to address each point of your response. And I will also be forwarding it to the moderator's forum, so that they are clear about what is being said by whom and to whom.

Lets start about the pornography issue and your complaint about the ban and the video you linked.

You know i dispute that the post was pornographic. How can i show it wasn't? It is just up to a moderator to say it is and you're done. There was no warning or debate. And I've shown today the same thread had other terrible material posted in it and that was just ignored. How can i tell what is acceptable? Now I have a letter from James saying I can post what I like from my dreams etc. for I wanted to clear up the preaching issue, but some of the dreams are pretty weird sexually as well so I need to run that past him as well.

I got a 3 day banning for the "Pornography" and that was followed by a 7 day banning for the "sock puppets". I think the letters confirming this are in my inbox.

You can dispute it until the cows come home. You cannot show that it was not. And here is why. As well as linking the video, you then took it further, and this is after the fairly obscene comment you made to beer:

I was just trying to understand which time you looked after your pussy was the time that fulfilled the dream, if it is such a regular daily event in any case.

After a couple of days of not getting my fix I felt like a little relief.
Strip - Hot Girl - oral sex naked female stripper anal porn

[link to the video which was removed by James R]

(Post 1125)

If that was not bad enough, you then took it further with a post that could be taken either way and made sure to tell Beer to climb on your "loverocket" and you stupidly assumed that just because you posted a song to go with it, that it was somehow acceptable and on topic and perhaps you felt it would not constitute of sexual harassment of another member. Wrong. Very very wrong.

And it gets even worse. You quote your sexual harassment post one more time to drive the point home. Because telling Beer to look after her pussy, to climb on your love rocket and that you liked oral sex and anal porn was just not enough for you, you decided to explain your posting the video and to see if Beer would get "horny" as you do watching it:

After a couple of days of not getting my fix I felt like a little relief.
Strip - Hot Girl - oral sex naked female stripper anal porn
[link deleted]

I thought I'd throw that one into the mix just to let you know I quite a normal guy as well. Well if you can watch that video and not feel a little horney you have more ability to resist temptation than I have.

So, do you really want to push the argument that it was not pornographic and you do not know what constitutes as pornography?

Really?

You are going to claim that you, a 60 year old man, asking women and men on internet forums to ride your love rocket, posting erotica and explaining how and why it makes you horny, do you really think we are going to buy the line that you don't think it's pornographic? That you cannot tell that is pornographic or not?

Now, onto what James advised you that you can post what you like. Knowing James as well as I do and for as long as I have on this site, I can assure you, 100 percent that at no time would James have meant it in the way that was not in accordance to the rules of this site. I saw you comment in one of your posts that you feel that what is acceptable on youtube should be acceptable on this site. No. Not everything on youtube is acceptable for this site.

While he may have said that you can discuss your dreams, I am also 100 percent certain that at no time would James have meant your wet dreams.

I do not know how or why this is so difficult for you to understand. Do you understand the concept of boundaries and what constitutes personal and private information? Or do you think strangers on internet forums, posting and reading a religious sub-forum and in a thread supposedly designated to Christian Songs want to hear about the wet dreams you have and how you get off sexually? Because I can assure you, we don't want to know.

"I'm sorry, what did I confirm?" By implication you confirmed that BW/S is female. I had no previous idea.

Whether beer is male or female is beside the point. Whether you knew or not is beside the point.

Your posts and your link were clearly out of bounds and constituted sexual harassment and was clearly against the rules of this site.

"Tell me, were you a theist when you were dating 3 women and having an affair with a married woman? Or were you just a bastard who was taking advantage of women?" Well I was single male on NZ Dating and there happened to be a few interested all at once and I had to try and work out what to do.
Yes I was a theist at the time. Multiple dating is not a crime as far as I know.

No, it is not. However it is hardly moral or fair to the women involved.

The affair with the married woman really messed me up, but somehow the Lord did not stop it.

Lying often does mess up a lot of people.

"You are going on this manic rant about how apparently atheists lie because they do not believe in a God that would punish us if we lie. Which is total and utter bullshit. So stop stereotyping and stop trolling this site with your personal issues."
So would you be willing to only ever tell me the truth? I think you do come close to it. But would you promise that to me?

This does not even make sense.

When I post on this site, I tell the truth. What I have told you in this PM, for example, is the truth.

I don't owe you any promises or anything for that matter Robittybob1. You tried to stereotype all atheists as liars, which we all know is false and incorrect. So cease and desist.

---

Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
"Like you know why you used these words in the current quoted post. Whether I believe them or not, doesn't matter for you know what you intended. Just like when I deliberately write posts with double meanings, allowing you to choose whichever meaning you think I'm saying. But in the end it told me what I had wanted to know; that is whether you were male or female and you revealed yourself (unless you were meaning to deceive all of us).
But Bells confirmed it, so I'm fairly certain. So you were finally outed after 3 years of picking on me, after 3 years I found you."
I'm sorry, what did I confirm?

Let me reiterate something for you Robittybob1, so we are very very clear and so you stop spraying this across the site and cross posting constantly.

You were banned for posting inappropriate material on this site.



Why are atheists finding telling the 100% truth so difficult? I can see it, since there is no "God" to punish them, there is no incentive to tell the truth, for lying is more profitable and convenient. But then how can they claim to be moral? What morals are they talking about?
Atheism is when there is no God to stop one from lying. So are you a theist or an atheist?
Bullshit.

Tell me, were you a theist when you were dating 3 women and having an affair with a married woman? Or were you just a bastard who was taking advantage of women?

You are going on this manic rant about how apparently atheists lie because they do not believe in a God that would punish us if we lie. Which is total and utter bullshit. So stop stereotyping and stop trolling this site with your personal issues.

If you have a complaint about moderation, then I would suggest you take it to the appropriate sub-forum and cease and desist in trolling threads in the religious sub-forum with your complaints and stereotyping.

For a guy who posted porn on this site, stalked a fellow member and wouldn't back off when requested, you have to be kidding yourself if you are going to try to lecture anyone here about morality. Unless of course you are going to claim you were moral when you dated 3 women at once and had an affair with a married woman? Where was your moral center when you did that, I wonder?"

My answer to your post:

You know i dispute that the post was pornographic. How can i show it wasn't? It is just up to a moderator to say it is and you're done. There was no warning or debate. And I've shown today the same thread had other terrible material posted in it and that was just ignored. How can i tell what is acceptable? Now I have a letter from James saying I can post what I like from my dreams etc. for I wanted to clear up the preaching issue, but some of the dreams are pretty weird sexually as well so I need to run that past him as well.

I got a 3 day banning for the "Pornography" and that was followed by a 7 day banning for the "sock puppets". I think the letters confirming this are in my inbox.

"I'm sorry, what did I confirm?" By implication you confirmed that BW/S is female. I had no previous idea.

"Tell me, were you a theist when you were dating 3 women and having an affair with a married woman? Or were you just a bastard who was taking advantage of women?" Well I was single male on NZ Dating and there happened to be a few interested all at once and I had to try and work out what to do.
Yes I was a theist at the time. Multiple dating is not a crime as far as I know.

The affair with the married woman really messed me up, but somehow the Lord did not stop it.

"You are going on this manic rant about how apparently atheists lie because they do not believe in a God that would punish us if we lie. Which is total and utter bullshit. So stop stereotyping and stop trolling this site with your personal issues."
So would you be willing to only ever tell me the truth? I think you do come close to it. But would you promise that to me?

Regards
[Your name removed]

You will see, nowhere did I ask you questions about what turns you on, etc, as you are trying to convey that I did in this thread when you insinuate that I asked you questions. I responded to your comments about your affairs by saying lying is bad.

What I did say, clearly, that your posting stuff like that is not acceptable.

And how do you respond to this?

Hi Bells,

It started with B/S trying to mock me by saying she had a dream come true "she fed her cat".
I tried to show her how stupid that was when she'd normally feed her pussy every day, for then how would she know which occasion satisfied the dream? And it deteriorated from there.

My fix was getting over the previous 2 day ban. - Nothing to do with sex, but because the YT was linked at that point, it was a double message. Had it been a Christian song you wouldn't have thought anything of it.

Now the YT was sensual but it was not sexual or pornographic for those with YT accounts and over 13.
It had been on YT for 5 years and most like it. But I said even though it is not pornographic I personally have trouble watching it and staying pure in thought, and i was wondering how the other guys got on watching it?
Did you watch it through? Did it turn you on? It certainly did that to me.
Is it only if it turns you on that it is pornographic then is it?

I find videos of Turkish Belly Dancers turn me on as well, and they have featured in the thread before.
So there is no clear definition of porn.

The "Love rocket" comment comes from Physforum where they had goaded me with that song prior to me using it on Sciforums.

About the dating 3 women at once well obviously that didn't last long, when/since I tell the truth.

Having the affair - I cover this in my thread, although it is not clearly spelt out out, but it was my intense love for Mary, that is the origin of the poems and prayers and years of sorrow. All that covers this episode.

It seems that you read all my double meaning posts the same way as did B/S so in the end I thought she must be female. Now that I know I will be a little more careful with what I say to her.

I think we are getting on alright, at the moment, considering she has been abusing me for 3 years across both forums. She hates my Life first started on Mercury idea.

James R isn't James Randi is he? That would be the most unusual coincidence if he was for I tried, 12 years ago, to do the James Randi paranormal challenge but the North Texas Skeptics kept me out of it.
And now we are going to try and do the same test through the Sciforum site!

I will always tell you 100% truth Bells and I sensed you were saying you'd do the same for me. That is the start of a friendship if you can achieve that.

I hope this clears up some points, but in a way maybe it didn't. But I am happy being back on the forum and now [Delete comments you made about other members which do not pertain to this discussion, nor do we have their permission for you to post the comments you made about them]

Cheers
[Your name removed]

I say to you... Don't post stuff like that on this site as it's not acceptable. Your response is to tell me what sexually arouses you and then ask me whether it turned me on.

There is no context. I tell you, it's not acceptable and go into detail and post links of where and what you said that was not acceptable. You respond and tell me what turns you on sexually and then ask me if it turns me on.

Do you understand what you did that was wrong?

Do you understand what sexual harassment means?

Because frankly, I am getting sick and tired of your dishonesty and your attempts to snidely infer that I somehow asked for you to sexually harass me via PM and to sexually harass others on this site.

To put it bluntly..

Shut the hell up your perverted creep. You are not allowed to post your sexual dreams, fantasies, what turns you on, how you get off, pornography, and everything else inbetween on this site.

 

[Bells]

Now Bells OK so it was James who banned me. OK but look, the dreams will not be anything like the YT. So I will write my dream posts and get them vetted by a moderator before they get posted then should I.
I just want to be able proceed but not to be interrupted by bannings.

What the fuck?

What part of WE DON'T WANT TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR SEXUAL DREAMS didn't you understand?

We don't want to know about it. We don't want to read about it. We don't want you to post it on this site.

The answer to your question is NO!

My God...

How god damn sick are you?