How can a poster know what will be deemed as pornography?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You STILL don't get it.

YES, it was pornography. That is why it was deleted and you were banned.

Whatever claims I have made about you are not unsubstantiated. You did post porn on this site, after making a slew of posts which were wholly inappropriate. Since your return, in attempting to point out to you and again explain to you why it was not appropriate, you then sent me some PM's.

I again explained why, in absolute detail, how and why it was not appropriate.

Your last PM was, in one part, to explain to me what arouses you and why you found that particular video sexually arousing and then even went so far as to tell me what else turns you on and then you asked me if that turned me on as well.

No, really.

Who does that? Who PM's complete strangers and says crap like that?

Believe me, my saying you are a pervert is not unsubstantiated. Just on that last PM alone.

As for this forum believing what moderators say. Ha! Talk about ridiculous!
Well since you keep referring to the contents of our PMs why not publish them in full? I don't think what I said to you should have been read in the way you seem to have done so, I don't believe that they will be read by the forum in such a bad light as you seem to insinuate.

You may publish the PMs in full but stop dribbling sordid bits to your advantage please.

Regards
Robert
 
Well since you keep referring to the contents of our PMs why not publish them in full?

If I had to guess, I'd offer two reasons:

1) This is not a debate. She's a moderator, you're not. She has nothing to prove.

2) She recognizes that the whole point of this exercise is for you to share your sexual kinks with strangers, and doesn't have any plans on indulging you. The content is offensive and against the rules, and won't be duplicated here.
 
Well since you keep referring to the contents of our PMs why not publish them in full? I don't think what I said to you should have been read in the way you seem to have done so, I don't believe that they will be read by the forum in such a bad light as you seem to insinuate.

You may publish the PMs in full but stop dribbling sordid bits to your advantage please.

Regards
Robert

The simple fact of the matter is you have been asked to stop. Failure to do so could be construed as sexual harrasment in some jurisdictions, and PM's can be made available as evidence.
 
If I had to guess, I'd offer two reasons:

1) This is not a debate. She's a moderator, you're not. She has nothing to prove.

2) She recognizes that the whole point of this exercise is for you to share your sexual kinks with strangers, and doesn't have any plans on indulging you. The content is offensive and against the rules, and won't be duplicated here.

I understood the contents of PMs were to be kept private but all along Bells has been leaking little bits making me look like a pervert, to use her words. I thought that was against the rules. But all is fair in Love and War it seems.
She has told you all the worst bits but totally out of context.
She certainly is a fighter!
I see on another thread with a very seductive pic. Some do and some don't. Some get away with it but I don't.
Is this OK is it? http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?88575-Miami-Dolphins-r-doin-it!-Playoff-hunt-baby!
 
The simple fact of the matter is you have been asked to stop. Failure to do so could be construed as sexual harrasment in some jurisdictions, and PM's can be made available as evidence.
It was me asking Bells to STOP. Has she asked me to stop? What was I going to stop for I'm not doing anything? Do you mean "Stop objecting to being ridiculed"?
Are you going to extradite me to the USA so you can have me up for sexual harassment?

The time she said "stop" was in this sentence "Stop acting like a pervert and then perhaps people won't swear at you." I've never acted like a pervert, its just her giving me shit.
 
Everybody else is at fault but you, eh?

You posted that video before you were banned. Which made it all the more disturbing. As if you thought I was going respond in kind and forgive you for that awful tongue of yours so you could somehow dodge moderation. Besides, I didn't need to be forgiven. I called you a psychopath for things you had openly posted previously.
 
I understood the contents of PMs were to be kept private but all along Bells has been leaking little bits making me look like a pervert, to use her words. I thought that was against the rules. But all is fair in Love and War it seems.
She has told you all the worst bits but totally out of context.
She certainly is a fighter!
I see on another thread with a very seductive pic. Some do and some don't. Some get away with it but I don't.
Is this OK is it? http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?88575-Miami-Dolphins-r-doin-it!-Playoff-hunt-baby!
I don't need to make you look like a pervert.

The parts you quoted in full is enough to make you look like a pervert. You want me to help make you look like an even bigger pervert?

No, really, what is wrong with you?

I quoted and posted your PM's and my response to you in the moderator's forum. They can deal with you. Because frankly, you make my skin crawl.

It was me asking Bells to STOP. Has she asked me to stop? What was I going to stop for I'm not doing anything? Do you mean "Stop objecting to being ridiculed"?
Are you going to extradite me to the USA so you can have me up for sexual harassment?

The time she said "stop" was in this sentence "Stop acting like a pervert and then perhaps people won't swear at you." I've never acted like a pervert, its just her giving me shit.
I'm sorry, you mean you didn't understand that when I said your posts were inappropriate and unacceptable that you were incapable of gleaning that you should stop?

Really?

And you say you aren't thick?

How many times do I need to break it down for you that what you posted is not acceptable before you actually get it?

You really think your PM to me was acceptable?

You really think your posts which saw you banned were acceptable?

You know, if you want to post that crap, there are other forums out there that would suit your needs. Or open a blog. This is a science forum. Not a 'I want to post my sexual fantasies and dreams in the Religion subforum because I think they are prophetic' forum.

You want to ask James about whether you can post that crap (ie your sexual dreams, etc) on this site, go for it champ. See how well it turns out for you.
 
Everybody else is at fault but you, eh?

You posted that video before you were banned. Which made it all the more disturbing. As if you thought I was going respond in kind and forgive you for that awful tongue of yours so you could somehow dodge moderation. Besides, I didn't need to be forgiven. I called you a psychopath for things you had openly posted previously.
Oh yeah that's right you called me a psychopath for no reason at all. Really generous of you.
 
.....
I quoted and posted your PM's and my response to you in the moderator's forum. They can deal with you. Because frankly, you make my skin crawl.
...

You want to ask James about whether you can post that crap (ie your sexual dreams, etc) on this site, go for it champ. See how well it turns out for you.
Is James back is he?
That moderators forum - is that readable by the forum or just the moderators?

You told me to put my case on here and now you growl at me all the time. It is too late to argue now though. Sorry it is time to go and get some rest.
Thanks Bells - we'll talk again tomorrow.
 
Just because it was likely to cause the feeling of arousal does that mean it was sexual? For there would be many things that cause arousal.

I hope this helps the forum develop a fairer policy.

Regards
Robert

Are you so dense that you actually believe we are interested in being aroused? Are you so obsessed with arousing videos, you're compelled to post them here? Give your head a shake, dude.
 
Are you so dense that you actually believe we are interested in being aroused?

I don't know about you, but on a lonely night, but he might have a point. 'Palm'ala and her five sisters will be having a word on such occasions.
 
This part of the site rules was followed correctly on my part.

No, they clearly were not. If you cannot understand the rules then perhaps it would be best to stop posting, so as to avoid the ban that will come later (and that you will not understand.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top