Jesus Christ Pose
Q- Should an African American in his right mind? Force himself upon the KKK's property? Will he be one dead nigger? Do not be offended by the language but this law lacks common sense?
I'm more offended by the punctuation, which makes the questions a little hard to figure out.
Thank you, though, for equating homosexual and race issues. Until homosexuality can be shown to be universally and definitively a conscious choice to deviate from heterosexuality, this is, truly, a fair comparison. And just like you can't discriminate against race, you can't discriminate against sexuality.
In the meantime, force himself how? By applying to rent an apartment, ignorant of the landlord's KKK membership, and expecting a Constitutionally-guaranteed right to equal protection before the law?
Why are you so fixated on homosexuals that you would want to undo the same Constitutional rights that protect you? Is it worth the sacrifice to lose your right to be treated equal despite your gender, religion, or ethnicity just to have your way about homosexuals?
Q- So homosexuality got out the closet why open the dungeon? Please name every pro that can come from this?
- Stable relationships among gays
- Greater social psychological stability (one less thing to fight and worry over)
- Population control (heterosexual breeders are solely responsible for the world's population crisis)
- We can focus attention on more legitimate issues than sacrificing our Constitutional rights just so we can be mean to gays
- Disease control (it is much easier to control the spread of disease if the affected are not hidden in the underground)
Hopefully, that's enough to start. We all benefit from these things.
Q- Beyond the fact that this is imposing upon people's rights look at the laws proposed. Why would any sane parent want homosexuals around their children?
Because, in their sanity, they are able to realize that it doesn't matter. I still laugh at the statistical assertion by the OCA that 95% of child abusers who abuse little girls are homosexuals.
You fixate too much on homosexuality, and I don't understand why. Parents should want good people around their children, and if that good person should happen to be gay, I'm not sure why it matters.
Q- Please tell, how can you spot a homosexual?
Depends on where you are. In the workplace, it's a little tougher. Nonetheless, people don't ask me if I'm gay, they tell me I am. I pretend to be surprised, but it's such an old hack by now that I find such idiocy to be a testament to bigotry. Hmm, I have long hair, own two Broadway-cast CD's, and won't hate another person for being a homosexual. Yep, must make me gay.
Besides, if your resume says you were employed, say, as an accountant for LGBA or even Oregon's "After Eight PAC" or "No on 9 PAC", the employer may well just assume you're gay.
Well said, No Freedom of Speech.
Support that assertion. Please show government intervention in the public media to prevent the discussion of Biblical declarations against homosexuality or, as you have it, other "perversions".
Q-So if I get 20 live in lovers can I get paid for each one?
No, it's usually according to domestic-partnership rules. Minimum cohabitation is usually an important criterion. But legalizing gay marriage will solve this problem.
Q- Just for money? And when should man and giraffe marriage's be legitimiate?
Homosexuality and bestiality are two entirely separate things. Please stick to the topic of your own topic.
If I get discriminated against for not accepting imposive twisted law's. That's fine, I still have my sanity
Depends on how you go about it.
Anecdote for you: At an insurance company where I worked, one of the things that was banned was open display of religious materials. One day, someone from HR noticed a desktop wallpaper on my computer that can be considered religious (see
Warath-Blossoms, and Perdurabo's "Seal of Babalon"). The HR agent reminded me that such displays were prohibited, but advised that she would not make me take it down unless someone complained. I asked her what she would do if someone complained about the public displays of Christianity, and she said, "Like what?" I then rattled off the names of about five employees who had Biblical symbols and phrases tacked all over their work area, emblazoned across their marquee screen-savers, and so forth, reminding her that I wasn't complaining about them at all, but rather that I was happy to share equal rights all around.
What, then, constitutes "upholding biblical truth"? Believing what one chooses? Or actively demanding that others be stripped of the rights the one enjoys according to equal protection under the law (a Constitutional standard)?
And, as you note, "If" you get discriminated against. Provide some theoretical examples, please. (See preceding paragraph.)
Q- And where are the pro's in encouraging kids to accept unnatural sex as norm? And should science be removed from the schools as well?
Funny you should ask that second question, since it is people alleging to espouse biblical truths who would destroy science in schools (demanding that Creationism be given as much credibility as the scientific method).
In the meantime, the pros include:
- Less bigots like you dragging down society with petty spite.
- Better-prepared doctors, psychologists, social workers, and schoolteachers (the OCA's anti-gay measures in Oregon would have affected the Universities as well)
- A better learning environment for gay students, who are regularly persecuted and alienated by their classmates
- Hence, better-prepared students all around
- Greater comfort with human sexuality in general, leading to less internal conflicts--people are happier and more secure when they have fewer internal conflicts
- Greater productivity for society, as several stumbling-blocks thrown in society's way by religious fanatics and bigots evaporate under the weight of knowledge
Science has found no promiscious perverse unnatural genes, therefore, quit blamming God for personal decisions.
Do biblical advocates ever bust out of their dualistic notions, or is the condition a permanent handicap? You should check into the DSM and which of its listed disorders are included under the ADA. You might be entitled to government assistance in your life.
And blaming God for the personal decision to be a raging, lunatic bigot is only partly inappropriate. Atheists, operating without a presumption of God, can only blame the bigots. Theists can blame God for Its contribution to neurotic and psychotic bigotry.
And given that churches have doctrines which (when Christian or Judaic) are protected by the Constitution, I'd like to see some of those lawsuits (if any exist) and what the courts say. If the Boy Scouts can teach hatred, why can't a Christian church?
However, if a Church body chooses to slander or libel someone while campaigning for the enactment of their favorite bigotry, they should be held responsible. It would seem that Christ protects liars and haters, but the Constitution does not.
-Tiassa
