Heterosexuality is unnatural

Status
Not open for further replies.
john smith said:
Im not bruised, but im definatly going to sit on her lap, round.............about........................now, By the way, she thinks your a joke
Yeah go asks for opinion from women about men. You wimp!
 
i am sure it may have been mentioned in this pernnial debate, but isn't it tru:
males on the whole (pun intended hehe)have a voracious sexual drive?

that many men--all i bet--know about masturbation

tus they know/love their dick, especially if big which they will longingly look at in mirror etc...be proud of. as well their body if well developed

so. isit too much to imagine that given the circumstances and maybe even change of onsciousness due to a chemical, atmosphere whatavyou, the will/could explore same sex sex...?
 
Buddha1 said:
O.K., so now I know what its all about. I had mistakenly taken you to be a sincere person trying to discuss this issue. But the above statement clearly shows your bias, and refusal to look at any logic because it's about religous or semi-religious values.

I think I have allowed you to waste this thread space. enough. But did you think you will for ever get away with it.

Another example of you jumping to false conclusions. This isn't anything to do with religion. If it was I would tackle it from a religious perspective. Have it your own way Bhuddah1. Talk to yourself.

peace

c20
 
I don't think it will take a rocket scientist to point out that buddah1 is clearly gay or bisexual. Everybody should leave him alone, he just wants attention like many gay people do. Anybody diving into his semen and egg laden pool of discussion is equaly gay. Regardless what you say you are gay buddah1, thats cool! But for the love of God stop trying to feel so insecure about it and trying to make people see your views alone. Cheers butt fucker
 
spuriousmonkey said:
You can't prove a man wrong who rejects other people's arguments because they do not mesh with his own view.
I assure you I don't reject arguments unless I have valid reasons to do so, in which case I am obliged to give/ discuss those reasons -- which should of course be further up for debate.

If you rememebr a case where I have rejected something without ascribing logical reasons, please tell me and I will set things right.
 
devils_reject said:
I don't think it will take a rocket scientist to point out that buddah1 is clearly gay or bisexual. Everybody should leave him alone, he just wants attention like many gay people do. Anybody diving into his semen and egg laden pool of discussion is equaly gay. Regardless what you say you are gay buddah1, thats cool! But for the love of God stop trying to feel so insecure about it and trying to make people see your views alone. Cheers butt fucker
Aren't you the one who came thudering into my other threads wanting to prove me wrong and then meekly ran out mumbling "I concede" when I dared you! And then being the lesser man you are, deleted that post.
All you guys who pretend to be lions and make bold, insulting statements eventually are forced to quit because you can't prove me wrong. And if I'm right then that means that all of what you are saying in the post above is a bag of hot air.

You are nothing but wimps out to assert your social powers that yiou got so cheap by sucking up to women. You don't have the real thing so you depend on that kind of thing. In the olden days real men moved mountains to prove they were men. You get the same social power on a platter for just emptying your semen into a vagina. And this easy power has intoxicated you to such an extent that you can't seem to care that you don't have the real thing. YOu are not real men. You can't compete with real men in a level's playing field.

You are just dumping your frustrations here because your false manhood is being exposed. That's all I'll say. I think I'm a busy man and want to conduct a meaningful discussion. I don't have time to deal with wimps like you! Go start a thread talking about Budhha bieng gay and have fun with it! ;)
 
devils_reject said:
But for the love of God stop trying to feel so insecure
.
It's you who is insecure. I did not invite you here! You came because you are frustrated at your fake power being exposed.
 
LOL okay should we both start a thread and debate this topic. Just me and you. And let everybody see who's the village idiot. Ready?
 
EVidences of Pressures on men to be heterosexual in a western society
devils_reject said:
Anybody diving into his semen and egg laden pool of discussion is equaly gay. Regardless what you say you are gay buddah1
That's a good example of the pressure tactic that is used in the ourside world by the vested interests of the heterosexual ideology to stop the truth from coming out.

Interestingly for a long time scientists could not report same-sex behaviour in the wild because they were immediately labelled 'gay' by these vested interests. And that label has a tremendous effect on straight men, who will do anything to avoid it.

This pressure works just as well in the present age, and no matter how much political power the gay community accumulates, straight emn will continue to be scared of the label. Unless of course they understand the whole mechanism of oppression.
 
I deleted the post because I didn't think it was even relevant. You don't even know about sacarsism. Anyway lets start this thread and let everyone know who's the butt fucking village idiot. Ready to defend your position?
 
devils_reject said:
I deleted the post because I didn't think it was even relevant. You don't even know about sacarsism. Anyway lets start this thread and let everyone know who's the butt fucking village idiot. Ready to defend your position?
I doubt your capacity to debate, but let's give it a try.

But there are some rules that we both will have to follow:
- Discuss like a man: Stop accusing, blaming and finding motives. Stick to the point in question.
- Be as specific as possible. Don't leave things to my imagination. Make your points clearly. Be ready to provide evidences/ logic when asked.
- No points that have already been discussed in detail will be entertained unless you read them up first and can come up with something new.

I suppose they are pretty reasonable rules. You can tell me if there are some rules you want to add.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
natural selection, sexual selection.
Oh, so let's see, you don't want people to differ at all. Is that so? otherwise you'll run away and not play.....like a child.

I wanted to discuss the issue and give you reasons why I differ, but you are so arrogant that you just threw those one liners and never came back. And now you blame me for rejecting your theories without giving a reason......well, I never!

I don't agree with sexual selection theory and I'm willing to discuss and give my logic/ evidences for my assertions. At times I may ask you to give me sometime to do some homework, but that should be allowed.

I always welcome a sincere discussion.
 
And I am happy that you are happy that we are discussing these differences in word meanings.

However, my brain is a little mushy at this time, so I will refrain from writing any more until a little later.

You may commence with your exposition of my previous observations.

As a reminder:
I'll take the rest of the points raised by you later.

You may do this at your leisure.

In the meantime, let me put in a good word about tea, or properly, an infusion of the leaves of Camellia sinensis.
Do you also love to drink tea? I hear it's very popular in the Orient. I prefer plain old green tea, although there are many different types and grades and flavours. Some taste coarse and robust, some taste almost toasted, and others are sweet, green, and mellow. Let us cherish these simple pleasures before the Bomb. ;)
 
Buddha1 said:
What do you want from me you wimp! Go play ropes with the girls, that's where you belong!

He was reminiscing about how you two did your things with girls together. Only sometimes it was difficult to tell you from the girls. He narrated how he had mistook you for the girl, and god were you in pain!

But you know you are not a man! Pansy!
So this fag is dependant on women to tell him he is a man. Pathetic, pathetic!

Now either disprove me or accept that you're the real fag !

I think what we have witnessed here with buddha1, is a case of "if you can't beat em, join em."
So confronted by his own insecurity about his own sexuality, he has become the very sexist, homophobic monster he despises. Lashing back with name calling, calling people "girls".

Buddha has gone to all lengths to attack people who are comfortably heterosexual and/or masculine.

How can we take anything you say seriously?
Heterosexuality isn't an "ideology", its nature. Remember? That wonderful thing you were talking about? Males and females fuck to reproduce, its complex, and yet its quite simple.

So you've studied "Western Society" - apparently of your own iniative and by your own standards - and you are so free to criticise the west, yet there is no place in the world where homosexuals and lesbians are more accepted than in the western countries!!

Out of interests, what country do you live in? Wouldn't be fair not to tell us what country you live in would it?


Seriously dude, calling people fags, girls, etc, whats wrong with you?

You and duendy would make a great team.
He hates whites, and white society, you hate heterosexuals and their society.
You should recruit someone from the "Religion" section, who hates the non-deluded!! (atheists). May I suggest "witnessjudgejury"??
You are both at least as intolerant and bigotted as the people you criticise.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top