Heterosexuality is unnatural

[Buddha1]

Maybe some of these threads could be merged?

Spurious monkey, the problem is when you want to discuss one issue, people would like to discuss others. The issues are innumerable and it gets confusing as well as difficult to manage in one thread.

Otherwise I go on discussing the same points over and over again with every new comer even when I have already given my justifications/ evidences for them.

 

[john smith]

Well Buddha1, you have created many threads on 'Heterosexuals', and every single one of them could be merged into 1.Why did you not do this?, simply because you wanted to show the populous at sciforums what your views on heterosexual activity is.Let alone from being mildly disturbing you are almost 'racist', note i lose the term loosely, in an anti-straight propoganda campaign.If you dispute this, what the hell was the purpous of the threads you created on the topic? You seem to be extremly insecure in your sexual orientation,as are most gays, who seek praise for their descisions from both straight and gay alike.Why is this?

 

[Buddha1]

How should I know, you yourself spoke of yourself as an expert. And I took what you said as I would have heard from an expert - an objective truth.

Well, I am basically objective, but I believe in cutting iron with iron. YOu have to talk to people in their own language, because only then will they understand. their folly. That's part of my strategy. But if I were you, if I find something fishy about a post I would check the posts before and after that, before I responded.

 

[john smith]

Fishy you say, reminds me of something Buddha1, oh yes, right, you and your crazy 'assed' (note i use the term loosely, no need to get offended!!) threads.

 

[Buddha1]

don't call c20H25N3o "Honey", he's male dude,

Something I can't say about you!

By the way I called Avatar honey. And I will call anyone anything I want. I am sure C20 will not become a woman just if he is referred to as honey, neither will Avatar. And if they don't mind who are you to complain.

But perhaps I should reserve words like these for wimps like you!

For more information see :Heterosexuality is queer!

Now either disprove me or accept that you're the real fag! And that's a challenge. But heterosexual men are not straight enough to accept challenges exposing their fake straighthood. Because they lack the real thing!

 

[Buddha1]

Fishy you say, reminds me of something Buddha1, oh yes, right, you and your crazy 'assed' (note i use the term loosely, no need to get offended!!) threads.

What do you want from me you wimp! Go play ropes with the girls, that's where you belong!

 

[c20H25N3o]

What do you want from me you wimp! Go play ropes with the girls, that's where you belong!

Arent you yourself guilty here of polarising between sterotypes? Something you claim you find abhorrent and the root cause of the problem?

peace

c20

 

[Buddha1]

Fishy you say, reminds me of something Buddha1, oh yes, right, you and your crazy 'assed' (note i use the term loosely, no need to get offended!!) threads.

Oh, by the way I bumbed into this friend of yours. A real heterosexual guy like yourself. He asked me to tell you to pay him a visit. Click here to reach his site:

He was reminiscing about how you two did your things with girls together. Only sometimes it was difficult to tell you from the girls. He narrated how he had mistook you for the girl, and god were you in pain!

 

[Buddha1]

Arent you yourself guilty here of polarising between sterotypes? Something you claim you find abhorrent and the root cause of the problem?c20

Stereotypes are often based on truth --- even though they are exaggerated. Unless they are manufactured or if they are applied on wrong people -- that's when the problem arises. See gay guys never mind the stereotypes of homosexuality being characterised as femininine. Because they don't find offensive.

But I don't understand you taking the side of this wimp. Is it because he is a 'heterosexual'? So you would support a heterosexual no matter whether he is right or wrong?

 

[john smith]

Something I can't say about you!

Real snappy, why dont you take your bich fight elsewhere?

By the way I called Avatar honey. And I will call anyone anything I want. I am sure C20 will not become a woman just if he is referred to as honey, neither will Avatar. And if they don't mind who are you to complain.

The thing is, with most homosexuals (i know im sterotyping, and im sorry to those which this doesnt apply) they are vastly unconfident in there sexual orientation, therefore feel they have to prove that they made the correct diccisions, usually by being excessively flamboiant and overt, or by proving that being straight is disgusting...this is you Buddha1.

But perhaps I should reserve words like these for wimps like you!

Have you ever even seen me, no, i dont like to blow my own trumpet, but seriopusly im no wimp.

For more information see :Heterosexuality is queer!

This is what i mean, stop shoving your unnatural views down my throat,i dont appreciate it.

Now either disprove me or accept that you're the real fag !

Well im not going to waste any more of my lying around time disproving your crazy theory.So i guess you can label me a fag (You better explain the situation to my girlfriend though), idiot.

And that's a challenge.

Look mate, you may wish i was as gay as you (understandable ), but im not, im quite happy with the way i am, im sorry this does not apply to you.

But heterosexual men are not straight enough to accept challenges exposing their fake straighthood. Because they lack the real thing!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, you crazy puff, leave me alone

 

[john smith]

And me winding you up, has lead you to make some crazy rash statments, proving yourself, as if we needed more evidence a weak 'man'.

 

[Padmora]

Oh Buddha, Buddha, my dear, I'm shocked to see how many threads you have started about exactly the same theme.

Why can't you just admit that you're a gay man among many others who hates heterosexuals, why the need to cover it up behind fancy words?

 

[c20H25N3o]

Please please please will some gay forum members respond to this assertion by Bhuddah1 :

See gay guys never mind the stereotypes of homosexuality being characterised as femininine

Is that true? Or are you sick of the stereotypes as well? I think that is pretty important to establish before anything else Bhuddah1 says can be considered. Where is Mystech when we need him?

c20

 

[Buddha1]

..

Have you ever even seen me, no, i dont like to blow my own trumpet, but seriopusly im no wimp.

Have you ever seen me, no, i dont like to blow my own trumpet, but seriously im no fag. I dunno about you. Your behaviour is certainly what in my theory is characterisitic of lesser men unsure of their manhood, and utterly dependant on servicing women to help them reassure they are men. They lack the real thing!

This is what i mean, stop shoving your unnatural views down my throat,i dont appreciate it.

Then what the f* are you doing here! If you had any belief in your being a man you would easily come to this site and prove me wrong. But you know you are not a man! Pansy!

Look mate, you may wish i was as gay as you (understandable :, but im not, im quite happy with the way i am, im sorry this does not apply to you.
I have no wish of the sort.

Don't Call me mate. I don't associate with your kinds. Only a man may call me a mate!

You could be f* queen for all I care! You are a blot on the male race! I would wish you not call youself a man at all!

Well im not going to waste any more of my lying around time disproving your crazy theory.So i guess you can label me a fag (You better explain the situation to my girlfriend though), idiot.

So this fag is dependant on women to tell him he is a man. Pathetic, pathetic!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha, you crazy puff, leave me alone.

Run sissy, run.........

 

[c20H25N3o]

Stereotypes are often based on truth --- even though they are exaggerated. Unless they are manufactured or if they are applied on wrong people -- that's when the problem arises. See gay guys never mind the stereotypes of homosexuality being characterised as femininine. Because they don't find offensive.

But I don't understand you taking the side of this wimp. Is it because he is a 'heterosexual'? So you would support a heterosexual no matter whether he is right or wrong?

I dont think John Smith is a wimp. I think he is glad to be heterosexual and finds your assertions to be contrary to his own understanding. He (like I) does not have the benefit of closely studying lots of different people and cultures as you must have to make the assertions you do.
Telling us that we have natural sexual desire for men seems to be completely baseless because it isn't true for us no matter how many people you have studied closely. Perhaps we are the exceptions to your rule in your mind but in our particular lifes experience we see heterosexuality to be the majority choice and can find no external pressures to make it that way, it just 'is'.

peace

c20

 

[Buddha1]

Oh Buddha, Buddha, my dear, I'm shocked to see how many threads you have started about exactly the same theme.

Why can't you just admit that you're a gay man among many others who hates heterosexuals, why the need to cover it up behind fancy words?

Why can't you just come to the point and discuss things and cut out the crap if you believe you are right and I'm wrong! Otherwise just ignore these threads!

 

[Buddha1]

I dont think John Smith is a wimp. I think he is glad to be heterosexual and finds your assertions to be contrary to his own understanding. He (like I) does not have the benefit of closely studying lots of different people and cultures as you must have to make the assertions you do.

Oh! you've met John Smith, have you! I can prove he is a wimp, but then you have to stick to the discussion and stop ignoring everything I say.

He is a wimp who thought I'm a fag and he could easily run me down with his fake social powers. That's so typical of wimps!

But really, you have gone down in my eyes by supporting him. So you're birds of the same flock! :bugeye:

Telling us that we have natural sexual desire for men seems to be completely baseless because it isn't true for us no matter how many people you have studied closely.

I had just complained to you about your abnoxious way of putting arguments. I'm not used to this kind of discussion. When have I claimed that you have a sexual attraction for men. Can you show me!

Nothing I say is baseless. I am giving evidence for everything. You don't want to look at the truth. And that is not my problem. That is your problem.

And let me tell you another harsh fact. If were not speaking the truth. You and John and others of your ilk would have easily left me alone as a rambling nut. But no you are scared stiff because I'm talking about the truth.

If I put a post saying American have blue coloured skins. Would you pay me attention. No!

Perhaps we are the exceptions to your rule in your mind but in our particular lifes experience we see heterosexuality to be the majority choice and can find no pressures to make it that way, it just is.

C20, I'VE HAD A LOT OF RESPECT FOR YOU! BUT RESPECT HAS TO BE EARNED. I HAVE TOLD YOU A HUNDRED TIMES, STOP WHINING AND COMPLAINING. IF YOU DON'T AGREE PROVE ME WRONG! THAT'S ALL YOU'VE GOT TO DO.STOP ACCUSING ME OF BEING WRONG! SHOW ME HOW I AM WRONG! IS THAT AN UNREASONABLE THING TO EXPECT!

AND STOP SUPPORTING WIMPS!

 

[Buddha1]

Please please please will some gay forum members respond to this assertion by Bhuddah1 :

See gay guys never mind the stereotypes of homosexuality being characterised as femininine

Is that true? Or are you sick of the stereotypes as well? I think that is pretty important to establish before anything else Bhuddah1 says can be considered. Where is Mystech when we need him? c20

Don't call for help. Use your own brain.

So you want to now invite the gay ones to corner me from both sides. That's very cunning. Typical of heterosexuals.

Be a man C20 and take up my assertions and consider them. If you can't PROVE THEM WRONG, admit that they are right! What you are showing is not a positive masculine characteristic.

 

[Buddha1]

Oh Buddha, Buddha, my dear, I'm shocked to see how many threads you have started about exactly the same theme.

Why can't you just admit that you're a gay man among many others who hates heterosexuals, why the need to cover it up behind fancy words?

In my culture, 'gay' is a term of abuse. So watch it! You are a woman, and we are taught to be respectful to women + its a postive masculine quality. But there is a limit!

 

[Buddha1]

Well Buddha1, you have created many threads on 'Heterosexuals', and every single one of them could be merged into 1.Why did you not do this?, simply because you wanted to show the populous at sciforums what your views on heterosexual activity is.Let alone from being mildly disturbing you are almost 'racist', note i lose the term loosely, in an anti-straight propoganda campaign.If you dispute this, what the hell was the purpous of the threads you created on the topic? You seem to be extremly insecure in your sexual orientation,as are most gays, who seek praise for their descisions from both straight and gay alike.Why is this?

Do you remember my challenge! If you are really a man, take my challenge and prove me wrong! Cut out the useless accusations.

Otherwise go play with the girls! Go in the lap of your girlfriend, she can tell you you are a man, and you can heal your bruised sense of fake masculinity!