Good lord,how many times does this have to be repeated before people get it?
Not many…because you like Stokes continually forget the point here. Now you genius’ argue that since a gun is inanimate and thus cannot harm others unto itself, as is a cigarette. But we know that smoking causes cancer not only to oneself, but to others, of course the person who smokes it had to light it etc. But that hasn’t stopped gov’t enacting laws for the public good to ban it basically everywhere for the public good. Why not guns? Same tired arguments you genuis’ make consistently without fail can be applied to cigarettes, and what do I get apologists, who can only ad hom. And to Stokes if I am ad nauseam here, its because you aren’t understanding simple logic.
Numerous examples of countries where the murder rate has failed to decline after the passage of gun control laws have already been posted.
A correlation to Stokes do you agree with this? This isn’t awfully scientific, remember I posted a economist article which disproved this assertion (also to Nasor) if you don’t look back in the thread. Thus if you stokes agree with this HIGHLY unscientific assertion made by Nasor here, then you agree that the correlation btwn the raising temperatures and the concurrent rise in C02 means that there is global warming. If not then stop being a hypocrite and STFU.
Not many…because you like Stokes continually forget the point here. Now you genius’ argue that since a gun is inanimate and thus cannot harm others unto itself, as is a cigarette. But we know that smoking causes cancer not only to oneself, but to others, of course the person who smokes it had to light it etc. But that hasn’t stopped gov’t enacting laws for the public good to ban it basically everywhere for the public good. Why not guns? Same tired arguments you genuis’ make consistently without fail can be applied to cigarettes, and what do I get apologists, who can only ad hom. And to Stokes if I am ad nauseam here, its because you aren’t understanding simple logic.
Numerous examples of countries where the murder rate has failed to decline after the passage of gun control laws have already been posted.
A correlation to Stokes do you agree with this? This isn’t awfully scientific, remember I posted a economist article which disproved this assertion (also to Nasor) if you don’t look back in the thread. Thus if you stokes agree with this HIGHLY unscientific assertion made by Nasor here, then you agree that the correlation btwn the raising temperatures and the concurrent rise in C02 means that there is global warming. If not then stop being a hypocrite and STFU.