Logic and mathematics work perfectly in super-dimensional theories there is nothing there that 'defies logic'. In fact, the use of additional dimensions simplifies the mathematics and logic of quantum theory... that is why they were brought into use in the first place.Originally posted by MarcAC
Super string quantum physicists are now discovering higher dimensional math. For the theory of superstrings to be correct higher dimensions have to exist. If anyone here knows about higher dimensional math, he/she /it - for the hermaphrodites - knows that it is not wise to try and argue about a God who exists in a realm which is broader than our own - in other words would exist in other dimensions. Physics of the black hole , wormhole. All this is just man's pitiful struggle to understand. But hey if they are right who are we to argue about God from our 4 dimensional existence. Higher dimensional math would apparently defy logic.
From your perspective, of course. Given the myriads of definitions people have for gods is it any wonder that my objections do not quite match with your personal imaginative fantasy and interpretation.You sound all mixed up Cris.
Yes, it is known as the laws of physics, and as such, not only is there no need for a god to intervene there is no need for a god to exist. In which case why create one?This whole universe, works like a system, a machine, everything is nicely placed, and in working order, at least we are testiment to that, so there is no need for God to intervene, its common sense.
Of course. But then there is no need for gods to exist for us to have this. This is a natural result of our evolutionary history.….we have "free" will, but only in accordance with our particular situation, but the beauty of this free will, is that we can ask serious questions pertaing to our identity and what happens when we die, how did this universe come about, etc..
No, only where they represent logical impossibilities.I take it then, you are ruling out every description of the Christian god, because it does not fit in "your" idea of life.
I don’t know, please give me a verse reference. We were talking about attempting to prove a negative; Christianity was not the issue.Where does it say in the Bible, that you should go out and seek God, until you find Him?
You mean I don’t understand your personal interpretation of what you think a god should be. There is no source of such a fantasy except inside your head.You are arguing about something which you clearly don't understand, the logical thing to do, would be to develop some understanding, and then make your point.
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
" You realize even this hypothesis is not happening. You realize the number of Thiests has declined over the past 300 years? Why would that declention change?]
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
" There are not billions of eyewitnesses for jesus. WHERE THE HELL are those eyewitnesses. Not only would they be dead, but obviously even if there were billions of them, not all of them would have been recorded. On the contrary, next to no eyewitness testimonies have come up. Unless of course, you mean people that say they have seen jesus in some white light or whatever. ?]
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
"
Let me ask you something muscleman: Do you belive in aliens??]
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
" .
6. THEREFORE: (here is the part you didn't understand), Everything is preordained by GOD'S knowlege.
7. AND Since everything is preordained and everything can happen only ONE way (the way in God's mind), THEN free will and choice can only HAPPEN one way, therefore taking away the choice and the free will with it.
?]
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
"
You say you are still waiting for a biblical contradiction? How bout the fact that it says earth formed only 15,000 years ago?
So does this mean your brain sinned?"If yur eye causes you to sin, it will be better for you to pluck it out and throw it away than to enter Hell with both eyes. If your hands will cause you to sin, it will be better to cut if off and throw it away than with both hands and enter hell".
That is a very odd statement.This is Jesus parable such as "It is easier for the camel to enter the eye of a needle pin than for a rich man to enter heaven".
So by this logic we should kill all infants at birth right? You really need to get your head out of your ass boy.SO WHAT GOOD IS IT IF GOD LET THOSE CHILDREN LIVE AND BEING UNDER THE CARE OF AN EVIL PARENTS WHO THEN WHEN MATURE BECOMES EVIL LIKE THEIR PARENTS AND ENTERS HELL, THE BABIES WILL BE BETTER OFF HAVING NO BODY AT ALL THAT WAY THEY W0NT OFFEND GOD LATER IN YEARS, RATHER THAN TO HAVE LIVING BODY AND ENTER HELL LATER IN LIFE.
but that all youve done. Said that there are billions of eyewitnesses. You have done nothing to back up your statement.Child, there are billions of testimonies for God, from physical vision, to message in their heart and mind (some of u accuse as schizophrenic, but the difference is 99.9999% of the schizophrenic hears voices to tell them to kill soomeone or something evil, i have a co-worker whos a nurse in aa psychiatric hospital. So indeed, that maybe possesion of the devil BECAUSE NO SCIENTIST CAN FIND CURE FOR SHIZOPHRENIC, NOT ONE, PILLS CAN ONLY CONTROL THEIR BRAINS, THATS IT").
And how does this justifie what god did to job?The reason is so that God may be vindicated at His word and so that we might understand that trials and tribulations will come to those who are godly. In the former, we see the righteousness of God. After all, none are righteous before God (Rom. 3:10-12). In the latter we see the perfection of Job's faith (James 1:2-4).
Ive explained why i dont consider the bible a reliable source, becasue its the only place many of those stories are found and for the most part it was written several hundered years after the events were supposed to take place.I have presented evidence such as eyewitness testimonies, corroborated by New Testament writers and fulfilled prophecies. However, you predictably dismiss this evidence because it does not satisfy your presuppositions.
Big booming voice in the sky would be nice. On a more relaistic level it would take some event happening that is completely forbidden by the laws of science and can only be done by god, so far no event fits those requirements. To extend that to the christian god it would take the resolution omniscience paradoxes.What would you require, within reason, as evidence for God's existence?
Originally posted by Neutrino_Albatross
So by this logic we should kill all infants at birth right? You really need to get your head out of your ass boy.
Originally posted by Neutrino_Albatross
but that all youve done. Said that there are billions of eyewitnesses. You have done nothing to back up your statement.
Originally posted by Neutrino_Albatross
Big booming voice in the sky would be nice. On a more relaistic level it would take some event happening that is completely forbidden by the laws of science and can only be done by god, so far no event fits those requirements. To extend that to the christian god it would take the resolution omniscience paradoxes.
Originally posted by Cris
Much like a cartoon artist can create impossible situations for his cartoon characters.
Or something like a giant explosion which comes out of nowhere, and viola, an entire working universe.
Yes, it is known as the laws of physics, and as such, not only is there no need for a god to intervene there is no need for a god to exist. In which case why create one?
Who's creating one, and apart from that, He isn't created. If you are going to argue about God, then at least have some idea of who and what He is, whether or not you believe He exists.
Of course. But then there is no need for gods to exist for us to have this. This is a natural result of our evolutionary history.
Who's talking about gods, and who mentioned they exist because we have free will?
What evolutionary history?
No, only where they represent logical impossibilities.
According to your understanding.
You mean I don’t understand your personal interpretation of what you think a god should be. There is no source of such a fantasy except inside your head.
No, thats not what i mean (and well you know ). You should try and understand who and what God is, after all, that is the point of the thread. If you don't then all your spouting about reason and logic, means nothing.
Love
Jan Ardena.
Originally posted by whatsupyall
Neither side will convince the other, because one is evil, and the other is good, one is stupid, one is faithfull.
Originally posted by Neutrino_Albatross
I agree that we still have alot to learn about the universe but you claim that as we learn more atheim will decrease is not backed up by any evidence. In fact atheism has been on the rise as a direct result of increased kowledge. The more we know, the less we need to invent gods to explain the world.
That’s a foolish idea. My very first post here 3 years ago specifically showed why I felt that idea was wrong.Or something like a giant explosion which comes out of nowhere, and viola, an entire working universe.
Theists are of course, in their imagination. There is nothing to show they exist in reality. The idea of gods was created to provide explanations of things that at the time could not be explained. We now have science that helps us explain things. We no longer need to create imaginary super beings.Who's creating one,
I do understand very well – I am arguing against the imaginative fantasies of theists.If you are going to argue about God, then at least have some idea of who and what He is, whether or not you believe He exists.
Sorry I forgot, you don’t understand science yet do you?What evolutionary history?
Logic is independent and objective. Try it sometime; it’ll help you understand where you are going wrong.No, only where they represent logical impossibilities.
According to your understanding.
Originally posted by Raithere
Logic and mathematics work perfectly in super-dimensional theories there is nothing there that 'defies logic'. In fact, the use of additional dimensions simplifies the mathematics and logic of quantum theory... that is why they were brought into use in the first place.
This is the same old 'God of the Gaps' argument Marc. As we come to know more about our Universe some concepts of God are continually reduced in scope so that God can fit into the remaining 'gaps' the unknown areas. Eventually, this path reduces God to something entirely ineffectual... what use is a God that hides from us?
~Raithere
Logic is independent and objective. Try it sometime; it’ll help you understand where you are going wrong