Qorl said:SkinWalker and others;
They are scientists.
Read the whole thing - please. On the Internet it's so many links like for some celebrity. But don't bother I will do a job for you people.
Internet, schminternet. What are the "scientists" names?
Qorl said:Copy from the net;
-Some of the skulls are believed to be between 5,000 and 36,000 years old.
Believed by whom?
Qorl said:The Mitchell-Hedges family loaned the skull to Hewlett-Packard Laboratories for extensive study in 1970.
And the primary source or citation for their results are where?
Qorl said:Art restorer Frank Dorland oversaw the testing at the Santa Clara, California, computer equipment manufacturer, a leading facility for crystal research. The HP examinations yielded some startling results.
Right. There's an authority. He writes new age books on woo-woo topics. Next.
Qorl said:Researchers found that the skull had been carved against the natural axis of the crystal.
What researchers? What are their names? What are their research institutions? What are the citations to their work?
Qorl said:Modern crystal sculptors always take into account the axis, or orientation of the crystal's molecular symmetry, because if they carve "against the grain," the piece is bound to shatter -- even with the use of lasers and other high-tech cutting methods.
Right. Says what art authority other than the one above that is marketing woo-woo books. Moreover, what art authority says how these "crystal skulls" are made?
Qorl said:To compound the strangeness, HP could find no microscopic scratches on the crystal which would indicate it had been carved with metal instruments.
Still waiting for the citation to "HP." That way we can read their methodologies and results for ourselves.
In short, what we have here is a host of assumptions and very little in the way of verifiable facts. Lets see the facts. And, consistent with woo-woo claims, we are told that the claimant is "doing our work for us.