Well, in your example you said that the complexity of the the computers isn't a proof that God exists. But such complexity was created by our inteligence.
No i didn't. I stated that just because something looks complex as a finished product, doesn't mean it is when you break it down to it's basics, (origins). Want me to quote my entire last post as evidence?
On my 3rd paragraph i stated that seemingly complex systems aren't proof of a god, and that still stands. Perhaps you misunderstood but "systems" doesn't imply computer systems like windows xp. My apologies, i didn't think i'd need to point it out.
Seemingly complex systems: Such as this particular spider that looks identical to an ant, (and only eats ants). The one problem of course is a spider has 8 legs, whereas ants have only 6. So the spider lifts his two front legs above his head like antennae and thus gives off a convincing appearance that he is in fact an ant..
To a creationist that would imply design.
Of course they never look at the other side of things:
There's a moth which, while larvae, burrows a hole in the ground and goes to sleep for 13 years. It comes out of the hole, climbs up a tree, turns into a moth, has sex then drops dead. The femal survives a tiny while longer in order to lay new eggs.
Of course this particular moth has no quarms that it's entire existence is purely to get laid, and hell, why would it complain?
There is no sign of complex behaviour within this species. It doesn't actually do bugger all.
I apologise you thought i was referring to linux 1.4 or windows millennium, but i wasn't.
No one would ever say that computers can be generated by natural processes without an intelligence behind.
And why would we? We know humans make them. Does anyone
know god made us? Can you provide some proof plz.
However, in the Universe there are things that are so much more complex...
And so many things that are just plain daft. Furthermore, and i hate repeating, things only seem complex from this perspective. We don't have all that much understanding of the universe and everything on it, so how could it look anything
other than complex? Once it is researched, analysed, and evidence is acquired, things start to look that much more simple.
In this case you believe that there isn't an intelligence involved...
Once more for the record: I dont "believe" anything in this context. I simply look at the evidence. Currently there is None to suggest we were created, and a whole heap of evidence to suggest we evolved. From debates on creationists forums they give nothing but the following:
Things are complex; thus god did it all
I don't see a rabbit turning into a dog (this is so so common and yet comes from simple ignorance to what evolution actually is)
Giraffes have a thing in their neck which allows them to bend over without bursting a major artery; thus god exists
and other such arguments based on pure heresy and nonsense. It's as weak as early earth belief. Of course that too is possible- just nothing to support it.
I just think your example isn't coherent...
Perhaps we just speak a different language?