I'd have to disagree there , it depends on the person, not the religion. Then again, the personality of the person will say how much they adhere to their religion, etc. It all boils down to a person's beliefs and morals - whether ludicrous or not, they are those people's morals and most people don't want to change them.
The most we (who have different views, ideas, and morals) can do is to tell them about our view, give them some unopinionated information about the subject, and that's it. The thing about morals is, you can't push yours on other people's. THAT, itself, is morally wrong.
Elbaz: About the genetic engineered-weed thing, do we really need to use a Genetically-modified organism as an analogy? We could just use Australia as one. Domestic dogs, sheep, cats, rats, and TOADS, have taken over and dominated the local food chains since we set them there, accidently or deliberately, many years ago.
OH, and ELBAZ, you meant the Tasmanian Tiger aka Tasmanian Wolf, not the devil. The devils are still alive and kicking, but the Thylacines (Tasmanian Tigers) haven't been seen since the 1930's or something, thought there have been recent sightings...
Against eugenics huh? I'm sort of into it. If science can improve my mind and body, i say alright. But hey that's freedom right?
--Liberty means allowing other people to do things you disapprove of, if they will give you the same right.--
The world would be alot nicer if they modeled their views, morals, and lives after the above little saying.
Cheers