Magical Realist:
Yeah we know how you operate James.
Yeah. I operate on the basis of actual evidence, not on wishful thinking.
You made the claim that your video shows clearly that there was no tricky or fraud. I asked you to back up your claim. And what have you got? Nothing. As expected.
In other words, you made an empty claim that you can't support. Again. This is based only on what you'd
like to be true, rather than on any actual evidence.
As soon as anything unexplained or paranormal is presented here you cry fake.
No. I have not jumped to any conclusion, unlike you.
You said that you had evidence that
disproves fakery of this particular demonstration. But you don't have that, do you? You just say you do. You're willing to tell lies, in other words.
Do you have proof it is fake? No..ofcourse not.
No, I don't. But it's
your claim we're looking at here. You said you had proof it isn't faked. And you don't.
It's like talking to a brick wall. You have no genuine scientific interest in any of these phenomena.
You're quite wrong. Stage conjuring is something that I take some interest in. As I said, I can think of about three different ways off the top of my head about how your Chi Guru Guy could pull off the paper-burning stunt with fakery. But I can't tell from the video how he did it in this particular case. My simple point is that there's similarly no way that you can be sure that the video is genuine. This is true for almost all of the videos you spruik so credulously.
You are only interested in dismissing them and so preserving your precious worldview where no unexplained phenomena exist.
I'm quite open to the idea that unexplained phenomena exist. It's just a pity that the "evidence" you offer up concerning all such phenomena is of such a generally poor standard. But I know you don't actually care about evidence. What you have is a faith and a desire that it all be true.
But I'm content that I have provided things that are compelling enough to get your gander up.
I'm just pointing out your shoddy standards every now and then. The sheer volume of crap you post, combined with your inability to concentrate on one thing for more than a couple of minutes before going off onto something unrelated, means that it's impossible to call out all your crap. But an occasional reminder to readers that it's crap doesn't hurt.
Reality is not what you think it is.
It's a pity you waste so much of your life on this nonsense, while ignoring the true mysteries of "reality".
Not even you can suppress forever this nagging suspicion that all these things are real.
Yeah, that's a constant struggle for me. LOL.
But claiming something is faked and refusing to investigate that phenomena is the opposite of science.
Ok. Let's investigate!
What information do you have about the Chi Master video other than the video itself? Or is the video all you've got?
Take the case of this chi master. Skeptics were able to perform enough tests to learn his abilities were not being hoaxed.
Great! Where is this written up? I'd like to review the controlled tests that these skeptics performed.
No metal plates in his body.
You have the x-rays, I assume?
You have the details of the search that was carried out, I assume?
He shocks them when he touches them.
Maybe, or maybe not. What evidence do you have of this apart from the video?
And he lights an LED he holds in his fingertips.
Well, there's no possible trick he could use to do that, is there? I assume you have checked this, and that you've never seen a stage magician do anything similar.
A pure electrical energy summoned at will in his body that mysteriously defied measurement with a voltmeter.
Sorry, I didn't watch that part of the video in detail because I was interested in the paper-burning stunt.
Are you saying that a voltmeter measured nothing special while he did his tricks?
Science did it's job in this case and confirmed the existence of a new phenomenon.
Great! Show me the scientific report.
That's the kind of research we need with such phenomena. Willing openminded testing of it instead of outright dismissal of it as fraud.
I agree, and it's great to hear from you that a proper scientific investigation was carried out. So, let's see the report. If it's solid, I will wholehearted agree with you that there's some good scientific evidence for mysterious human electricity, or whatever.
My guess is that all these claims of scientific testing that you're making are baseless fabrications, and that you'll now try to change the topic, as usual. But we'll see.