if an atheist has a view that claims to god are delusional on the basis of their personal experience (which encompasses a very insignificant part of the "real" world), how is that any different from a person making the claim that oceanographers are deluded on the basis of inspecting their bathroom sink?Or lack of them. Actually, ignore that. It's a patent nonsense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3YOIImOoYM
From the author of "The End of Faith"(Dawkin's review: "The End of Faith by Sam Harris is a genuinely frightening book about terrorism, and the central role played by religion in justifying and rewarding it. Others blame “extremists” who “distort” the “true” message of religion. Harris goes to the root of the problem: religion itself. Even moderate religion is a menace, because it leads us to respect and “cherish the idea that certain fantastic propositions can be believed without evidence”. Why do men like Bin Laden commit their hideous cruelties? The answer is that they “actually believe what they say they believe”. Read Sam Harris and wake up.")
Actually it's a lack of belief in the absence of evidence. Which is quite different.
Religion can be occultism. It can pacify and it can brainwash. It can also provide salvation to those who feel they have no other option.
if an atheist has a view that claims to god are delusional on the basis of their personal experience (which encompasses a very insignificant part of the "real" world), how is that any different from a person making the claim that oceanographers are deluded on the basis of inspecting their bathroom sink?
Unless you are referencing your own body of "evidence" or "logic", its not clear on what grounds you would dismiss theistic claims - eg - there is the claim that the soul is continues after the death of the body - how do you deem there is no evidence for that (without referencing your own experience as an authority)?Except that I don't base my view on personal experience alone but rather the actual claims and evidence (or lack thereof) of religious people.
its not clear on what grounds you would dismiss theistic claims - eg - there is the claim that the soul is continues after the death of the body
Honestly, that is one of the most ignoratn things I've read on this site. You don't bother to listen to his actual argument but Know what he's gonna say. Nice.Well parts of it, the whole thing is kind of long (23 minutes), whats the difference my argument still holds up...this same guy Sam Harris or Richard Dawkins will tell you the reason Stalin killed over 20 million people (millions more than all religious wars combined)
The video has absolutely nothing to do with "atheistic faith." The simple fact is that much killingis done in the name of religion. Aisde from the fact that your term "atheistic faith" is completely meaningless, it has nothing to do with this thread.wasn't because he was an atheist, it could NEVER have anything to do with the fact that the thought there was no karma, no heaven, no hell, no consequences of killing, but if a religious person kills then it MUST be because of religion, it can ONLY be because of their religious beliefs....great atheistic tactic...continue to preserve the atheistic faith at all cost...
Religion can be occultism. It can pacify and it can brainwash. It can also provide salvation to those who feel they have no other option.
if an atheist has a view that claims to god are delusional on the basis of their personal experience (which encompasses a very insignificant part of the "real" world), how is that any different from a person making the claim that oceanographers are deluded on the basis of inspecting their bathroom sink?
I noticed he said we have faith against faith, Christian against Muslim against Jews....From the author of "The End of Faith"(Dawkin's review: "The End of Faith by Sam Harris...
Actually I did watch the whole thing, typical atheistic propaganda (promoting the atheistic faith), calling something ignorant without explaining how its so is exactly what atheism is ALL about...Honestly, that is one of the most ignoratn things I've read on this site. You don't bother to listen to his actual argument but Know what he's gonna say. Nice.
Yes it does, just like Dawkins says, he wrote his book just to convert more people into atheists, this is what Dawkins HIMSELF says....grover said:The video has absolutely nothing to do with "atheistic faith." The simple fact is that much killingis done in the name of religion. Aisde from the fact that your term "atheistic faith" is completely meaningless, it has nothing to do with this thread.
Actually, Harris is against the taboo against not being able to question someones faith based beliefs. Didn't you notice the part at the end when he says something to the effect of getting rid of faith means we have to get rid of a spirituality.Actually I did watch the whole thing, typical atheistic propaganda (promoting the atheistic faith), calling something ignorant without explaining how its so is exactly what atheism is ALL about...
Yes it does, just like Dawkins says, he wrote his book convert more people into atheists, this is what Dawkins HIMSELF says....[/QUOTES]
Where does Dawkins say this?
What exact atrocities are these that are being committed again?Why doesn't the guy speak out against atrocities committed by atheists?
wrong.I know why, it doesn't serve his purpose, which is too ridicule religion,
Wrong.make fun of people who aren't atheists, then take the victim stance to make it look like atheists are always the victims, and we should all feel sorry for the poor atheists and hate religion...
Let's see the whole quote.To quote Sam Harris "We do not respect people's beliefs"...
So you think its reasonable to think that Jesus Christ is going to float down form the clouds at some point and save all believers?that sums up atheism "Everyone besides me is just another delusional fool, lets ridicule them, make fun of them, then say well if you had some type of hypothetical evidence which I can't tell you, then I would believe you, even though I can never tell you what can be considered as evidence, if you had evidence I would believe you"
What atrocities have been committed in the name of atheism again?I speak out against ALL atrocities, ALL killings, regardless of its atheists or theists doing the killings and horrible acts, this guy however ONLY targets theists...you see the difference?
Yeah, don't know how this contradicts anything I've said, "you're ignorant and wrong because your belief just doesn't sound true, its sounds like a fantasy, case closed" thats the atheistic argument...Actually, Harris is against the taboo against not being able to question someones faith based beliefs. Didn't you notice the part at the end when he says something to the effect of getting rid of faith means we have to get rid of a spirituality.
He says it all his interviews...just go watch some on youtube...grover said:Where does Dawkins say this?
What do you mean? Go look it up, we have atheists going into churches and killing thousands and atheists saying "well it doesn't matter, it can NEVER be because of atheism"...we have Stalin going after religious advocates and killing them and atheists saying "well it doesn't matter, it can NEVER be because of atheism"grover said:What exact atrocities are these that are being committed again?
Can you please explain why someone's wrong instead of just saying "wrong" like atheists enjoy doing "you're wrong, God doesn't exist, you're just wrong"grover said:wrong.
Wrong.
The whole quote is not any different, he just talks about beliefs in history, but then encourages people to not respect othersgrover said:Let's see the whole quote.
Well logically its not reasonable, but disbelieving this is also not reasonable, the only reasonable thing is to netiher believe nor disbelieve and say its unknown if its true or false...grover said:So you think its reasonable to think that Jesus Christ is going to float down form the clouds at some point and save all believers?
So in other words anything goes? So if I tell you that I think superheroes are real you have no chocie but to respect my beliefs? Or that the tooth fairy is real? Or that the Lord of the Rings really happened once?Well logically its not reasonable, but disbelieving this is also not reasonable, the only reasonable thing is to netiher believe nor disbelieve and say its unknown if its true or false...
Okay, so its alright that muslim fundamentalists are blowing up innocent people because they think they'll get 72 virgins. You are defending murder, what does that have to do with peace?I don't believe you should ridicule people's beliefs
atheists do...thereby reconfirming what I just said (which you said was just "wrong" without explanation)...
is it REALLY?Religion is a great enforcer of conscience which you will lose in an atheist utopia.