What I would like the world to do is to read Origin of Species and become better informed about the facts of science than is currently the case.
the only problem is, the evidence isn't fitting the alleged "facts".
The fact that some scientists claim a belief in God does not comport with the word “true”. I suppose you could offer a definition of “true scientist” if the spirit moves you. But they’re not being truthful if they admit to a God. That’s the issue I raised.
"admit to a god", you make it sound like . . .
do you really have that much of a problem with "god" and religion?
no need to explain it to me, i really don't want to know.
You made creationist statements (academics is just indoctrination akin to religion, scientists who disbelieve something (ot yet specified) about evolution are being suppressed, etc.
so sue me.
i noticed you never followed up on it.
Then you’re sending us to creationist sites. For clarity you should draw the line between your own propositions and those of the creationists, esp since you cast them in the same posts.
why not address the material presented instead of blowing hard?
Sure I did. I noted that Grumpy correctly observed that these were creationist links. Are you trying to tell us they have merit?
yes because i followed up on several of the cases mentioned.
The creationist site is irrelevant. It has no merit.
that's EXACTLY why creationists are being forced out of the game.
oh my, some more DNA transplants.
tell it to miller-urey, it was their experiment.
What was proved was that the building blocks leading to abiogenesis of RNA can occur naturally. What’s your objection to this kind of proof?
uh, maybe because it wasn't life.
In fact I suspect you’ll drop your suspicions about people being repressed, too, as well as your belief that scholarship in science is done through a kind of rote or indoctrination.
it's not suspicions, it's right there in the links i provided.
it isn't my fault you refuse to follow up on the material.
Another subject also comes to mind. Consider the rich life that forms wherever possible. Look at the abundance of flora and fauna in a desert oasis. Consider esp. the abundance of marine life found around thermal vents. One of the ingredients you are missing in your “model” is energy. The water you think forms easily is incorrectly stated. It takes immense energy to electrolyze one molecule of water, for example. The atoms you envision coming together to spontaneously form water is not the complete picture. Those atoms have originated from a highly energized source. What’s the probability of that happening? Pretty damn low on Earth.
how about putting a figure on the amount of energy the earths oceans needed.
Evolution explains how they got there, and indeed, Origin of Species explains how all life got here.
yes,
explains.
there isn't much data that really proves this explanation though.
Evolution explains it, whereas no other “alternative theory” does.
yes, darwinian evolution is an explanation of how different lifeforms can come into existence.
to bad science hasn't been able to conclusively prove it.
shades of tiassa dude, you are going to have to write shorter posts.
