Psychoticepisode
I'm not really going to argue your points because....well...I detect your more sinister side. You know, the little condescending one that makes you so popular. So I am going to lower my standards just to respond. OK?
quite the magnanimous chap, aren't you?
“
Originally Posted by lightgigantic
Faith (in regards to anything) can range from a vague inclination to concrete resolution.
”
Horse manure. The only thing concrete about faith is the heads of the faithful.
So when you ask yourself the question whether it will rain tomorrow or in two weeks time, the answer is always a 100% yes or no?
“
(Perhaps you are talking about the limits of what you can assume according to your knowledge base ....... and needless to say, there are tons of arguments out there about what determines the length and breadth of any knowledge base eg - the ol physics prof vs the high school drop out)
”
I agree, your knowledge is baseless.
according to your knowledge base, no doubt
“
more accurately, its frustrating for any person to have to resort to evidencing their claim to a person of an insufficient knowledge base who is convinced otherwise.
”
Quite right, yet we atheists still have time for brainless theists.
given that an atheist is bereft of evidence for their claim, there seems to be another element to the dialogue you are missing ...
“
I think you missed the part where faith plays an important part in increasing knowledge.
”
I haven't witnessed anything to support that claim. Increased knowledge in what? Sky faeries?
needless to say, if one doesn't have faith in universities as a place of learning, they will face enormous hurdles if they want to enter into the aeronautical industry.
“
Nothing else in this world makes itself knowable to a seer determined to do nothing but sit on their laurels
”
But nothing makes itself knowable to someone who goes after it?
it makes itself knowable via application, so, given the nature of application, there still remains a margin for error even if one bears initiative (...... but the margin for error is not anywhere near so complete as someone who displays no initiative).
approximating your level of initiative actually ...
“
Its not so much an issue of intelligence, but the values that drive it
”
Yes, theism requires one to possess very little intelligence. Idiot savants are very focused and as you well know they abound in your area of expertise.
its kind of difficult to use the words "idiot savant" while suggesting that one is not arguing from one's values (unless one wants to present one's self as an idiot, of course)