WRONG, within evolution we have NOTHING more than the accepted speculative correlations for the types of evidence you propose.
Clearly you know nothing about mutation rates in mitochondrial DNA.
Go learn some science and get back to us.
WRONG, within evolution we have NOTHING more than the accepted speculative correlations for the types of evidence you propose.
Clearly you know nothing about mutation rates in mitochondrial DNA.
Go learn some science and get back to us.
I shall try to keep it simple for you. There was a period in the 17th and 18th centuries, with scientific methodology still quite new, when some ideas were accorded the title Law.That inappropriate fashion has long been abandoned.That's why they call it the THEORY of Evolution. Evolution is NOT scientific LAW.
I shall try to keep it simple for you. There was a period in the 17th and 18th centuries, with scientific methodology still quite new, when some ideas were accorded the title Law.That inappropriate fashion has long been abandoned.
The acme of scientific thought is the theory. A theory is a complex combination of observations and explanations that have been thoroughly and exhaustively tested in a wide variety of ways, over an extended period of time, by a great diversity of individuals. This testing has consistently confirmed the heart of the theory and has revealed intricate relationships between varied aspects or facets of the observations related to the theory.
Evolutionary theory is as well established as anything in science. Your failure to understand this, independently calls your views on UFOs into very serious question. If you lack the intellectual integrity or the education to understand how foolish it is to reject the evolutionary theory, then why should we give any weight whatsoever to your speculations on UFOs?
So in essence, despite your graceful explanation of what is a basic donut dunking scientific clique, you cannot prove evolution anymore than I can, in your eyes, prove UFOs as being in part exemplary of extraterrestrial technology. Correct?
With respect Phlog, it is as a geologist that I came to understand evolution. The wealth of fossil evidence is overwhelming. You really can't look at the changes to ammonites, or graptolites, or trilobites and doubt the reality. It is really only in the last decade, when I have taken a deeper interest in biology, that the evidence from the various fields has impressed itself upon me. Nice as that evidence is, overwhelming as it is, I would still be quite happy to accept evolution based upon the fossil evidence alone.He's a Geologist, not a Biologist, so it's not up to him to prove evolution,
He's a Geologist, not a Biologist, so it's not up to him to prove evolution, like me, he's just read enough to accept the facts. Biologists hold evolution to be the most fitting theory, and there is DNA evidence to prove the theory.
Disproving evolution would not prove UFOs btw, so I'm not quite sure where you are going with this angle, unless you are some cult member.
My point is logic. Sheer logic dictates that if evolution cannot be proved, yet because of it's accepted peer reviewed status is considered legitimate science, it is no more valid a theory in proof than is the GREATER body of evidence (far more technologically primary anyhow) that supports the theory for extraterrestrial involvement in the UFO phenomenon.
Credible scientists have offered just as solid a case for the reality of extraterrestrial UFOs as has been offered up to support the theory of evolution.
Oh dear. OK, show me the complete set of fossilised UFOs you have. Show me the UFO DNA.
BTW, your 'logic' is fallacious. You could claim there's a big teapot in orbit near Saturn, and that theory, not yet being disproven, is a valid as evolution. That's just not true.
On your point of credibility. Please, show us one, not that Jesus freak or the foot doctor though. Friedman you will perhaps say,.... although he abandons peer review when it comes to his pet subject, ....
I know it is Stryder. Your assessment here is actually very rational and appreciated by myself.
More discipline and less enthusiasm is not one of my strong points.
Have you read EndLightEnd's latest offering? You might be surprised at how synchronized it is with your latest post in this thread. Pretty amazing.
When is the last time you saw successive photographs of something evolving?
There is definitely radar and trace evidence to support UFOs. (just like fossils my man, start digging)
Where is the myriad of evidence to support the teapot orbiting Saturn like all the EVIDENCE that exists to support the UFO/ET connection?
There is no such thing as "evolution DNA" There are accepted correlations that are merely speculative in nature as related to the mutation of DNA. That's it. Throw that DNA shit out the window. That does not begin to prove anything. It's merely supporting evidence that may in fact be no more than the use of unrelated process to fit preconceived far stretched claims. You, or no one else knows that for sure. Do you? Why? Because you cannot duplicate it. That's why.
The main problem with mentioning Endlight's input is again it jumps the gun. Most people won't take what you suggest seriously because you are pretty much missing the point in regards to "For the want of a nail".
Basically you point out Aliens and UFO's exist, however you are missing all the information that would build up to that outcome. (A bit like saying "the wars won" in that proverb, without understanding the relevance of the string of events that lead up to it's eventual outcome.)
It's known that Implantation and Mindcontrol techniques had been tested by a number of governments during the major cold war period, making near anyone a sleeper agent. You might ask why someone that has no affiliation with a government office would be implanted, well it could be a "Blue on Blue" test.
As evolution happens over a long timescale, and photography really quite recent, this question is STUPID at best.
UFOs, or ETI craft? Stuff that doesn't geti ndentified, or stuff that is Extra Terrestrial? Stop obfuscating and hiding behind terminology!!!!!!!!!!!
GEESE! you showed me fucking GEESE as evidence for UFOs. your evidence is rather lacking lacking therefore!
You really do yourself no favours when you make such posts. Why do you deny Evolution? What is your problem there? CULT MUCH?
Stryder
That face in your avatar is one of the most foreboding and sinister mugs I have ever seen. What is that from?
You continue to display the depth and breadth of your ignorance.This is simply NOT astrological or natural weather phenomena.
Phlog
What gives? This is just another go nowhere and state nothing post. I get it. You are overtly skeptical. So what? If you honestly can't offer anything useful such as information that directly explains this or that, why bother?
Stop cowering and answer the questions.
Stop saying UFO if you mean ETI.
Provide some evidence. Not testimony from Jesus Freaks or video of migrating birds. Show me a decent video, or pictures, that are not fakes.
Something, anything, please. Because I wanted to believe, and I looked, and there was nothing. People like you that grasp onto anything do the subject no good, because your standards are so low, meaning there is so much crap to filter out.
You continue to display the depth and breadth of your ignorance.
Newsflash: Two reclining twins pursued by giant lion across the heaven's.