electrafixtion
Registered Senior Member
I'm afraid that exactly what it means.
He might put forward a well thought out argument, but I'll guarantee he has no evidence to support that hypothesis. NOT PROVEN, sorry.
See, that's where you are wrong. There *is* most assuredly evidence a plenty. The EXACT same type of evidence that supports evolution and all other non repeatable sciences.
We have physical evidence to support UFOs. We have technical evidence to support UFOs. We have clinical evidence to support UFOs. We have documented evidence to support UFOs. What else do you want?
I could accept what you are stating as logically factual if all those other "accepted" piles of horse poop were to be declared "NOT PROVED" but...