Originally posted by Frencheneesz
Whatsupall:
No, you can't say that they all don't have ears when you SEE that some of them don't have ears.
so WHY DO YOU APPLY THE SMALL PERCENTAGE U TESTED TO THE REST OF THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS UNTESTED? YOUR CONTRADICTING YOUR OWN WORDS...
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
You CAN, however, take the people you have seen and apply that same PERCENTAGE to the rest of humanity. As long as you haven't had an irregularly low exposure to humans, that reasoning is fine.
FRENCHENEEZ, HOW MANY TIMES DID I PROVE YOUR WORDS WRONG? MANY TIMES, AND THIS IS ANOTHER ONE OF THEM...YOUR SELF CONTRADICTORY...
THERE IS FAR MORE ROCKS ON EARTH THAN HUMANS, AND ONLY ABOUT 100 TEST HAVE BEEN DONE...THERE ARE ONLY 5 BILLION PPL ON EARTH, PROBABLY LESS THAN 0. 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000001 % COMPARED TO THE NUMBERS OF ROCKS IN SOIL...I HAVE SEEN MORE THAN 100,000 PEOPLE IN MY LIFE, FROM TV, TO SCHOOL, TO MAGAZINES, ETC. AND THEY ALL HAVE EARS....AND IF I HAVE SEEN FEW OF THEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE EARS, I CANNOT APPLY THAT TO BILLIONS AFTER BILLIONS AND SAY THEY ALL DONT HAVE EARS....YOUR ILLOGIC OTHERWISE....
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
It is only the faith in high probability that keeps science up. Many people DO have faith in high probability, yet others of us understand the uncertainty and the acceptance.
WHAT IS SO HIGH OF A PROBABLTY OF YOUR TESTS? ARE YOU DELUSIONAL? (LOL, ACTUALLY I KOW U ARE). THE PROBABILITY OF YUR RESULT IS 1 TO 1,000,000,000. WHAT IS SO HIGH PROBABILITY ABOUT THAT? ARE YOU OK? GOT MILK? WHAT IS THE HIGH PROBABILITY OF TESTING THE DATE OF HALF AN ACRE ON EARTH, THEN SPECULATE AND GUESS THAT THE REST OF THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ACRES UNTESTED ARE THE SAME DATE?
YOU NEED SOME FORM OF PSYCHIATRIC HELP? IF YOU INSIST THAT IS A HIGH PROBABILITY...THEN I SUGGEST YOU SEE YOUR DOCTOR..
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
We ACCEPT that the earth is 4.55 billion years old because there is a ton of evidence for it and no contradictory evidence.
TESTING A FEW SPOTS OF THE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ACRES IS "TONS OF EVIDENCE"? ONCE AGAIN ARE YOU OK? AND AGAIN IF YOU INSIST, THEN I SUGGEST YOU SEE YUR DOCTOR...
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
We understand that there is the POSSIBILITY that our data is inaccurate or irrelevant, yet there is a LOW PROBABILITY of that being the case. So instead of going with the low probability, we go with the idea that has a high probability of being correct.
AGAIN YOUU NEED TO SEE YOUR DOCTOR...YOU TESTED "SOIL A" (LESS THAN AN ACRE), THE RESULT ARE NOT ACCURATE, ONLY ABOUT "70" %, SO THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THE RESULT OF THE SOIL U TESTED ARE NOT TRUE...A POSSIBILITY, BUT THAT IS UNLIKELY ACCORDING TO YOU...IT DOESNT MATTER, I SAY THE RESULTS ARE 100% ACCURATE, JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE ARGUMENT...
MEANWHILE "SOIL B" WAS NEVER TESTED (HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF ACRES), SO AGAIN YOU DONOT KNOW THE AGE TO THIS, AND U CANNOT APPLY SOIL A'S RESULT TO SOIL B'S RESULT, THATS NOT SCIENCE, THATS A SPECULATION AND A GUESS. YOU CANNOT TEST THE SMALL SPOT AND CLAIM HUNDRED OF THOUSANDS OF ACRES UNTESTED ARE ALSO 4 BILLION YRS OLD, YOU DONOT KNOW THAT, YOUR JUST SPECULATING OK CHILD?
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
There are speculations that have no base. Speculation is just an idea. That idea might have evidence or it might not.
YES LIKE THE ATHEISM, THATS WHY IM A CHRISTIAN...
Originally posted by Frencheneesz
I didn't say it has to be detected to be tangeble. It has to be ABLE to be measured.
IF SOMETHING THAT IS PHYSICAL DOESNT HAVE TO BE DETECTED, THEN HOW CAN YOU MEASURE SOMETHING THAT YOU CANNOT DETECT? YOUR STUPID IDIOT....