Perhaps you could present the evidence that convinces you and see how that goes.
There is no evidence and never will be but their (theists) game is all about talking about God before the claim has been established.
They rush past establishment of their claim which is in itself evidence that they have nothing to argue against or for.
Without the rejection of their claims they would have less than the little they rely upon for their world view.
Theists do no more than move the chat to "lets discuss the attributes of God"
without establishing that there is anything in reality to chat about.
We fall into their trap by seeking to disprove or to reject their claims when all we need do is walk away and say zip for them to fade and disappear.
I like to give them a reason to exist by engaging them.
Engaging a theist is however like beating up a kid who is unable to defend.
But to engage them is like feeding wild animals in so far as one does them no favours really and reduces their ability to survive.
Without our rejection or engagement they will disappear due to irrelevance.
They need opposition to survive and appear relevant.
They will never provide evidence for there is none.. it is only our rejection that provides any basis for their claims.
If we ignore them they will fade because they have nothing and upon that nothing their only hope of sustaining relevance is being in an arguement that elevates their irrelevance to at least being present as a side that supports something which even they can not define.
They are broken but still insist we damage them more by demanding we dismantle their superstition to the point of absolute irrelevance.
If we ignore them they move to total irrelevance and so they present nonsence in their futile attempt to stay in the conversation... and so we bite and seek to prove their wrongness and in so doing give them life that without our rejection they could not have.
Without an atheist to argue with a theist fades into nothingness.
They have nothing unless the atheist acknowledges that they made silly claims and calls upon them for support of such claims.
They love that..without rejection they fail to exist.
If we left them to claim crap is reality and walked past they would wither and die.
However the role of the atheist in the system of things must be to be there so believers have a position to oppose and convince themselves they have got it right somehow.
The theist is a delicate human that we should class as an endangered species for at this point in the evolution of humans they represent a species on its way out fading away to provide space for the new human who is more clever and able to exist unfettered by superstition and able to move forward without the crippling burden of superstition and denial of reality.
We are probably the last humans to be able to interact with the endangered theists and no doubt our grand children will marvle that we existed at a time where theists walked the planet and somehow survived despite their ignorance and reliance upon superstition to manage their lives. Our grandchildren will wonder how they (theists) managed to survive despite their meaningless baseless philosophy and only with no more than a foolish injection of a make believe entity they knew nothing about but managed to describe as God.
If you know a theisist take time to be near them and to marvel at the fact they have survived so long even though their relevance vanished many years ago.
The new human is here and natural selection sees the old superstitious human becoming no more than a curiosity to be studied by historians of the future.
Alex