You still haven't proven EV is a pipe dream. Why not just give up.
EV is a growing REALITY. Get over it.
EV is a growing REALITY. Get over it.
Admittedly fossil fuels are finite, so if man still exists on earth 1000+ years from now his energy system may nearly have returned to the 100% non fossil fuel base it had 250 years ago; but for more than 100 years, the fossil fuel percentage will be more than 50% of the total energy base. - Getting it down to that from the current 80% is a huge capital cost which seems unlikely to be possible in only a 100 years.I have said all along that it is going to take time.
You made the claim that mankind was switching to alternative energy, away from fossil fuels as his energy base. I have twice asked you to provide some fact supporting that, but thus far have only received your assertions that it is true.I really feel that I have given this thread everything it needs. ...
Adoucette. I am not required to answer any fucking (benign) question you pose. I chose to answer it indirectly. The fact you can't or refuse to absorb the minutiae of my answer proves you are just an idiot.
Your agenda to justify over consumption is duly noted. LOL.
Of course you don't have to answer it.
But this is the first time you have admitted that you didn't answer it.
Before you were actually claiming you had.
Again, I'm not a big oil user so I have no agenda. You claim that this is an over consumption, I just point out that it is what it is for reasonably rational reasons. Since you apparently can't appreciate our differences you put it down to us being ignorant.
You still haven't proven EV is a pipe dream. Why not just give up.
EV is a growing REALITY. Get over it.
Of course EV is a growing reality.
I didn't admit that I didn't answer it. I said I DON'T HAVE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTION YOU POSE. This isn't an admission that I didn't answer the question LOL. I stated that I answered your quesion indirectly, and that you didn't like my answer. So fucking what that you didn't like or get my answer. The answerer DOES NOT have to satisfy the asker dumbass.
I don't claim that YOU are an over consumer. I claim that your agenda is to justify the idea that AMERICA is fine in its over consumption. Something you have continually asserted in this thread.
Do you think that you are the physical embodiment of your nation?
Me? I answered the question. You are the one pushing the point, not me.Still DANCING I see.
Why is that?
What is it about that question that has got your knickers in a twist that you are going batshit crazy over it?
I live near Lakenheath airforce base. That is in the UK. All the americans around here drive oversize cars. What is their excuse dumbass? Their only excuse is that they can buy fuel on base at US prices. If that wasn't enough they container over their piece of shit gas-guzzlers from the US. JEEZUUZ. What a waste. But I guess they cab afford it so that's OK. Explain that one???
I think this is a key point.People will move away from oil use as tech improves.
The technology of the Volt is quite impressive, but the problem, as always, is economics. How well will they sell when the $7500 (plus more in some states) is phased out? When much less expensive IC cars are available with 40mpg it takes a lot of driving to break even, but then, with a lot of driving the Volt transforms into an IC car too.I think this is a key point. ...
Americans could reduce the size of their cars. In ten years time I think you will see that they have.
You have skirted this issue; can you address this:
UD:
Why do the Americans that reside at RAF Lakenheath drive big gas-guzzlers? Answer the fucking question.
I didn't bother because it's pretty obvious.
We have different tax structures.
The cost of your vehicles, which includes a substantial VAT tax, are quite a bit more expensive then the same vehicle purchased over here.
I looked up the Passat, and where as you can get a nice 2 liter 2012 Passat in the US for about $22,000 with sales tax, is about $40,000 in the UK.
Secondly, if you have a car and it's not that old, you take a real bath when you sell it, so if the Air Force will ship their existing car over for you and you can get gas at US prices, then in many cases it might make sense to do so even if the car isn't what you would buy if you lived over in the UK. (Many of our Air Force bases in the states are HUGE and are located in places where driving distances are also lengthy).
Then there is the fact that oversea tours at any given base aren't that long (2 to 3 years) and so the economics of selling your car here before you go to the UK, then buying another much more expensive car in the UK and then taking another bath when you sell it in just a few years simply doesn't seem to make much sense.
Again you simply presume us to be ignorant but there is likely a perfectly rational explanation that you would probably see if you weren't so bigoted against Americans.
Arthur
Complete BS.
You still are under the delusion that driving further requires a bigger engine.
What do Airforce staff need with a big engined vehicle?