Don't change the subject, Chinglu. Einstein's specific quotes supporting this effect are irrelevant because his SR postulate on the constancy of light only applies to inertial frames. This is well known. Haven't you ever heard of the time dilation effects of a centrifuge? All of these experiments are basically variants of the centrifuge concept. If you're just looking for attention then I'm done feeding the troll but it's already been explained to you why you haven't dismantled Relativity.
And you cannot just dismiss angular acceleration with a wave of your hand like that! hahaha
This is from another forum
Sure, we can include your ideas.
1) There is acceleration of the moving clock since it travels in a circle. You can calculate "a" using the usual equations and then you can use the SR constant acceleration equations and conclude it is extremely small as compared to time dilation.
2) You may also include the the gravity effect if you like.
However, where you are confused is that these effects are t' which I already accounted for. Since it is absolute, each from can adjust their times accordingly.
Yet, we still have this statement by Einstein which is where you are failing to understand the theory.
If we assume that the result proved for a polygonal line is also valid for a continuously curved line, we arrive at this result: If one of two synchronous clocks at A is moved in a closed curve with constant velocity until it returns to A, the journey lasting t seconds, then by the clock which has remained at rest the travelled clock on its arrival at A will be $$\frac{1}{2}tv^2/c^2$$ second slow.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
If you refuse to include this conclusion in with your assessment of SR, then you are a crackpot in the eyes of the theory.
So, I include this conclusion and forced SR into a contradiction.