Again with insults , the mods have warned everyone and you persist in thinking you are beyond their moderation, do not bother posting again Dw i will just ignore you and not engage you any more.
E=mc2 questions?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Right, this from the guy who - so far - has taken 14 pages to have basic facts hammered into him.
Facts that he SHOULD ALREADY KNOW if his claim of "having learned science" and "having read and understood the Wiki pages" were true.
Obvious bollocks given that you haven't bothered AT ALL to check Wiki, let alone an actual science text book.
And then you will misunderstand it and continue to talk bullshit.
It's not an insult if it's true.
''it's because you're a deluded uneducated thick as f*ck clown who doesn't learn anything''
Amazing that I have learnt maths, better literate qualities and learnt almost every application of science in some basic detail.
Amazing that I have learnt maths, better literate qualities and learnt almost every application of science in some basic detail.
Given the massive and persistent ignorance you've shown in this thread alone that's a demonstrably incorrect boast.
You have demonstrated that you have not. On the graph below, you are just starting to cross from "beginner" to "hazard" phase - you know enough to know some of the right words to use, but not enough to realize how little you really know.
I would presume to know the answer, but I asked because crackpots don't seem to be required to post facts. Let me ask a different way: how many times must someone post a false claim before some action is taken? And does it need to be the same claim over and over or would dozens of claims of several (wrong) facts do?I believe you already know the answer to that, so I'll just give a grin
Last edited:
However you want to describe what you are doing, it isn't working. It has resulted in you having less than a middle school level scientific literacy and an apparent preference for learning things wrong.
Some like White Dwarves, Neutron stars and BH's are degenerate matter.
This is your problem and not mine, you presume I have learnt things wrong and do not know the present information about what I talk about, I know you do not have the full understanding of gravity and if asked the question what is gravity, the answer is you do not really know, you have a word for it and know what the effects are, but you certainly do not know exactly what it is and the cause that makes the gravity effect.
I have has much right to second guess by logical means about gravity has much as the next man. My assumption based on atoms and the attraction of one atom to another atom fits the purpose explanation of gravity, also by observations such as the Cavendish experiment we could see that smaller mass was attracted to the larger mass, both masses were made of atoms, so I ask again why is this over looked, when it seems pretty evidential to me that a cluster of atoms will have a greater electrostatic force of attract to other atoms?
It does...But they are quickly squeezed beyond reasonable pressures to become degenerate matter.
Degenerate matter, thank you for that word, although whilst the atoms exist has they travel the radius of the Neuron star, according to science they do not exist, where my logic tells me they exist for a short period of time travelling the radius before they degenerate.
As one who has crossed swords with you in other threads, where you have raised and claimed similar nonsensical scenarios, I can understand the frustration of others.
And I dare say it is not Dywyddyr who is under any consideration by mods, but yourself.
You also as I have told you previously, need to drop all this posturing and pretense.
Remember its you that has had all other threads shifted to the fringe including cesspool...it's you who has been permanently banned elsewhere, not Dywyddyr.
Ok tag teamer, again you can not avoid the words of banned although you started the conversation quite well.
I understand their frustration but that is self inflicted, you have a choice to read or comment. You do not fluster me, it is a forum and we are talking, I do not get why you have a problem or should have a problem, I am simply questioning everything you expect me to automatically accept just because on someone's from history say so, only a fool does not question what they are being told to accept.
Most definitley yes. And re-enforced by your own statements that one should ignore all references and links to the past and think for one's self.
Here is where your ignorance of everyday accepted science begins.
For someone who claimed to have "learnt ... better literate qualities" you should know that the word is "as", not "has".
This was explained to you numerous times on the other forum.
Except that your "logic" is, demonstrably, drastically faulty.
But you don't have the right to claim it's science.
Then your assumption is wrong.
If gravity were electrostatic then it wouldn't be solely repulsive (a quality shared only by your puerile posts).
Since you - persistently - phrase it this way then it's obvious that what is "pretty evidential to you" is flawed.
And yet it is you that has been time and time again, shown to be wrong.
Listen ol fella, no one but no one, will ever go through life successfully with your silly attitude about thinking for one's self and ignoring all past knowledge.
I'm stating facts, and those facts in relation to yourself need to be aired every so often to warn the forum about exactly where you are coming from, and what exactly is your motive.
ignore all the links and references from the past, wrong, to question that knowledge and the quality of the evidence which so far science is lacking to convince myself that it has achieved much at all in the lines of evidence, and 100% facts.
I tell you what if you can tell me what gravity actually is and what the force actually is I will quit science right now?
How can you quit something you've never been involved in?
Also of course [and someone more knowledgable then me may like to confirm] the likelyhood of any atom existing anywhere near a Neutron star would be near zero for many reasons.
- Status