Hapsburg said:
there's evidence there. sightings, reports, some hav photos.
Sure, they have sightings and reports listed... even some of spurious and extinct creatures. But I saw no evidence for "dragons." Indeed, if there were any
real evidence for "dragons" of mythology, then they wouldn't be mythological. They would be paleological. There
is a difference between dinasaurs of millions of years
before hominids and the mythological creatures that
H. sapiens have been recording for the past few thousands of years.
By simply looking at mythology as a subject and not limiting yourself to one, very small, slice of human mythos, you would note that, througout history, man has created all manner of mythical beasts. That the "dragon" finds itself in several cultures really isn't surprising since in nearly each there are places to find fossil remains of prehistoric creatures from dinasaurs to giraffes. Add to this the almost universal identification of serpent figures with the underworld or the sinister, sprinkle with a moderate dose imagination and a desire to astound and astonish others with a good tale, and it's easy to see how these legends are created.
But in this modern age, it is irrational to believe that the dragon, as represented in either Western or Eastern motifs was an actual creature, particularly the winged serpent-monster that can take flight and even breath fire.
As to your anecdotal "evidence" of anecdotal accounts in Australia, I think you need to visit the
Embellishments of memory: the unreliable nature of eyewitness testimony and consider the true validity of someone visiting the Outback and recounting their tales of "giant lizards." Like the fish stories of my uncle, the creatures they saw undoubtedly grew in size with each re-telling of the story.
Your
belief itself is fascinating, however. Tell us, are there other irrational or legendary things that captivate your belief in spite of complete lack of actual evidence to support their existance? Do you, for instance, believe that Minotaurs or Centaurs once roamed the highlands of Greece or Anatolia or in Mesopotamia? Do you believe that Leprechauns dwell in rural Ireland? Or that Quetzalcoatl was a feathered serpent in Mexico until around 200 CE that ruled Teotihuacan when he wasn't "flying around?" Do you believe that lion-headed Griffons guarded the gold in the Scythian mountains in the 1st millenium BCE because Pliny the Elder wrote of them in his
Natural History and Aeschylus wrote of them in
Prometheus Bound?
I'm just curious where you draw the limits on your beliefs.
But a little more about the legend of Griffons:
In Prometheus Bound, Aeschylus (ca 430 B.C.E.) described Scythian griffins as "sharp beaked" "dogs of Zeus that ne'er give tongue." Herodotus (440 B.C.E.) commented in his Histories about the prospecting of gold in the northern parts of Europe, by declaring that he "cannot say for sure how the gold is obtained there," but that " the one-eyed Arimaspi purloin it from the griffins." Aeschylus doubted the story, however, and based his doubt not on the fantastic idea of winged creatures with lion bodies and bird heads, but that a race of men with only one eye could exist. In his Natural History (77 C.E.), Pliny the Elder, citing other authorities, said that griffins guarded gold in Scythia with ferocity.
It is no coincidence that the mountains in which many bronze and iron age peoples sought gold, copper and tin were home to many fossil remains of giant beasts (dinosaurs, giraffes, elephants, etc.) that periodically wash out of cliff faces and hillsides.