Does time exist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Write4U said:
A single mega quantum event, releasing all latent potential in a single energetic instant, which would be time t = 0 and the count emerged simultaneously with the expansion, which lasted a few nanoseconds of pure chaos, which began ordering itself until the Pilot wave created a universal constant time frame, but which allowed for individual timelines to develop as physical chronologies (patterns) began to form.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry I am not fluent in gibberish. I will move on to a thread where English is the language of choice.
 
origin said:
I'm sorry I am not fluent in gibberish. I will move on to a thread where English is the language of choice.
Click to expand...
If you have questions about my "gibberish" ask me to explain. Just dismissing something because you do not understand the language is closing your mind to different perspectives.

Ask which part is not understandable to you and I'll be happy to try to explain it in more understandable terms. I am not familiar with all the scientific terms, so I am forced to use metaphors., which may seem strange at first, but is the most efficient way I know how to make a proposition. I'd love to be corrected on details or usage of proper terms, but instant dismissal is not very productive to an informal but possibly meaningful exchange.

And looking at my post again, where did I not use the English language? I was not speaking Chinese was I? I believe every word I used can be found in the dictionary. Look them up and perhaps you may get a better understanding of what I am saying.
 
Write4U said:
It doesn't knowanything, but we do and have been able to estimate when the sun will have used all its hydrogen and begins to burn helium and begins to collapse which will again heat up the core which then begins to burn heavier elements, but that will cause the outer shell to begin expanding, eventually swallowing up the earth. This will start happenening between 4.5 and 5 billion earth years. Look it up, its explained in many links. Then sun doesn't know this, we do.
Click to expand...

Which has what, exactly, to do with Time (which was my point).
 
Write4U said:
If you have questions about my "gibberish" ask me to explain.
Click to expand...
I have seen your posts, I would just be inviting more gibberish.
Write4U said:
Just dismissing something because you do not understand the language is closing your mind to different perspectives.
Click to expand...
It is not that I do not understand the language, the problem is that you are writing nonsense (gibberish). I also am not interested in having a long tedious back and forth that accomplishes nothing.
Have a good day.
 
Last edited:
Looking for the consensus I'm gonna say the following based on the
philochron table.

ELEMENT ........... PROPERTY .......... MAGNITUDE
... space ................ extension .............. length, area, volume
.. becoming .......... time ...................... duration

Time is the continuous succession of moments or points. Time is the mathematical becoming.
Duration is the interval between two points in time.
In this case both time and duration are magnitive.
 
Last edited:
Kittamaru said:
Which has what, exactly, to do with Time (which was my point).
Click to expand...
It would be the end of Earth time. Not of Universal time with is associated with continued existence (chronology) of the universe (spacetime), but just the end of time for the chronology of existence of Earth itself.

IMO, each physical object has it's own timeline which starts with the formation of the object and ends with its demise.

Some objects have a timeline duration of nano-seconds such as bosons and fermions, other objects have time lines (chronology) so long that they can only be described as having a half-life, which means that after a certain length of time (a measurement of duration) half of the objects no longer exists and for that portion time does no longer exist.

I am really not trying to make it complicated. Is this not why we identify space time or any physical object as having 3 Dimensions + Time, a sum of three physically measurable properties plus the duration of time associated with their physical existence?
 
Last edited:
origin said:
I have seen your posts, I would just be inviting more gibberish.

It is not that I do not understand the language, the problem is that you are writing nonsense (gibberish). I also am not interested in having a long tedious back and forth that accomplishes nothing.
Have a good day.
Click to expand...
And the same to you.
 
Asexperia said:
Looking for the consensus I'm gonna say the following based on the
philochron table.

ELEMENT ........... PROPERTY .......... MAGNITUDE
... space ................ extension .............. length, area, volume
.. becoming .......... time ...................... duration

Time is the continuous succession of moments or points. Time is the mathematical becoming.
Duration is the interval between two points in time.
In this case both time and duration are magnitive.
Click to expand...

Irrefutable. Accomplished objective.
 
Time is the continuous succession of moments or points. Time is the mathematical becoming.
Duration is the interval between two points in time.
In this case both time and duration are magnitive.
Click to expand...
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "magnitive". Are you just saying that a duration in time has a magnitude? Like a 3 second duration is "magnitive"?

In what ways is your "philocron" idea different from standard physical notions of space and time? Where does it take us that standard physics cannot?
 
NotEinstein said:
I thought you had promised not to use that word ("potential") incorrectly anymore?
Click to expand...
Only if I used it out of context.
In mathematics and mathematical physics, potential theory is the study of harmonic functions. The term "potential theory" was coined in 19th-century physics, when it was realized that the fundamental forces of nature could be modeled using potentials which satisfy Laplace's equation.
Click to expand...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_theory
 
James R said:
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "magnitive". Are you just saying that a duration in time has a magnitude? Like a 3 second duration is "magnitive"?

In what ways is your "philochron" idea different from standard physical notions of space and time? Where does it take us that standard physics cannot?
Click to expand...

What is magnitive refers to the property of beings that can be measured,
but It is imperceptible. What is magnitive is objective, but not concrete;
for example in Physics: force, gravity and time. We feel weight, but not gravity.

In the philochron table space and time are considered independent.
 
James R said:
In what ways is your "philocron" idea different from standard physical notions of space and time? In what ways is your "philocron" idea different
Click to expand...

standard physical notions of space and time - make sense

In what ways is your "philocron" idea different - they are crap

Where does it take us that standard physics cannot? - Nowhere

:)
 
Asexperia said:
What is magnitive refers to the property of beings that can be measured,
but It is imperceptible. What is magnitive is objective, but not concrete;
for example in Physics: force, gravity and time. We feel weight, but not gravity.

In the philochron table space and time are considered independent.
Click to expand...
But inescapably connected. As long as space exists time will emerge.
IOW time is a latent ability which becomes explicated during the unfolding of space.
A latent Universal potential which emerges simultaneously with the Present.

Combined it acquires the magnitude of spacetime. IMO duration always measures the past..
 
Last edited:
Michael 345 said:
standard physical notions of space and time - make sense

In what ways is your "philocron" idea different - they are crap

Where does it take us that standard physics cannot? - Nowhere
:)
Click to expand...

We could never tell the difference. But there is the question; Does future time already exist?
Or is it always Now or in the Past?
If future time does not yet exist, Time is a latent potential, which becomes expressed only as Now.
When Now has passed it is the Past.
 
Last edited:
Write4U said:
We could never tell the difference. But there is the question; Does future time already exist?
Or is it always Now or in the Past?
If future time does not yet exist, Time is a latent potential, which becomes expressed only as Now.
When Now has passed it is the Past.
Click to expand...

You live only in NOW. As soon as NOW turned up past vanished. As soon as future turned up it became NOW

Pre NOW and post NOW are not in existence

How would you segment the past or future? In 1 second slices? How would you stick the 1 second slices together?

You are forever stuck in NOW

Please may I ask, which to me is a obvious question?
This time you wish to travel in (either back to the past or forward to the future) where exactly does this time hang out? Where is any aspect of the past or future located?

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
You live only in NOW. As soon as NOW turned up past vanished. As soon as future turned up it became NOW

Pre NOW and post NOW are not in existence

How would you segment the past or future? In 1 second slices? How would you stick the 1 second slices together?

You are forever stuck in NOW

Please may I ask, which to me is a obvious question?
This time you wish to travel in (either back to the past or forward to the future) where exactly does this time hang out? Where is any aspect of the past or future located?

:)
Click to expand...
I understand all that and I agree with all the subtleties.

The question was if Future Time already existed. I's a simple "yes" or "no" question.
 
NotEinstein said:
And you are. The "potential" in "potential theory" does not refer to a "value" or "mathematical potential", but to a "physical potential". This is literally stated in the second sentence of the lead of that Wikipedia article.
Click to expand...

It can be physical potential.

I clearly explained that I was using the term in it's generic form, which is at the top of the any encyclopedia ; "That which may become reality"
Definition of potential
1 : existing in possibility : capable of development into actuality
Click to expand...
po·ten·tial
possible · likely · prospective · future · probable · latent · inherent · undeveloped

NOUN
latent qualities or abilities that may be developed and lead to future success or usefulness
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top