Does time exist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember you asked. The point I'm thinking of...
What happens to that idea of change and movement are needed to have time, if a field can exist first of all without those things.

Then I ask , where did the field come from ; or what was the essence of the field ; in the first place ?
 
Then I ask , where did the field come from ; or what was the essence of the field ; in the first place ?
Simple... A math model. You need to start somewhere. Notice: It's not starting from nothing. i suppose where the particle is not, the values of the field there are zero ( my guess).
 
Last edited:
Simple... A math model. You need to start somewhere. Notice: It's not starting from nothing.

No its not starting from nothing . Mathematical model does not convince me , though.

I need to picture the logic.

So what is the essence of the field ?
 
No its not starting from nothing . Mathematical model does not convince me , though.
I need to picture the logic. So what is the essence of the field ?
Well, to me, in some ways it's like the geometrical theory of a spacetime manifold. But instead of dealing with space and time your dealing with charge, mass and energy and how those things interact. Did you notice my late add-on to post #586
I suppose where the particle is not, the values of the field there are zero ( my guess)These fields will be on/in a manifold of space and time, so the spacetime manifold alters as the field disturbances interact.
 
Well, to me, in some ways it's like the geometrical theory of a spacetime manifold. But instead of dealing with space and time your dealing with charge, mass and energy and how those things interact. Did you notice my late add-on to post #586

Of course

I suppose where the particle is not, the values of the field there are zero ( my guess)These fields will be on/in a manifold of space and time, so the spacetime manifold alters as the field disturbances interact.

The field its self is dynamic .

The field on its own is dynamic . The field is because of energy/matter .
 
Of course



The field its self is dynamic .

The field on its own is dynamic . The field is because of energy/matter .
Not where the field values are zero, yet, in theory the fieldstill exists there. Back to square one. Define dynamic without the concept of duration of existence in the first place?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top