Do you like how Dawkins, Hitchens et al. represent atheists?

There are a lot of 'ifs and buts' in there..and far too many "perhaps" it does this/that and the other..lets face facts..you are whistling in the wind aren't you?

Its described as a acting like a 'virus'. How is it passed on from one person to another?

I love it when scientists start getting all philosophical.//.poor ole Q..he'll be waffling about the 'Collective Unconscious' next. lol!

Pound sand.
 
Where did I say that?

Who said that?

Where did I make that conclusion?

I don't recall saying that either?

Those are all questions answered in the links above.

Is that your ultimate conclusion, or are you baiting, again?

Hmm did I misunderstand what you were saying?

So where exactly are these instructions? And how do they catalyse behaviour?

How do we "recognise" these memes?
 
Hmm did I misunderstand what you were saying?

Evidently.

So where exactly are these instructions? And how do they catalyse behaviour?

What do mean, "Where?" Are you looking for scriptures, or something?

Is not grabbing an umbrella before going out not a set of instructions on how to keep oneself dry in the rain?

How do we "recognise" these memes?

Do the same thing, apply the definition. Simple, really.
 
Evidently.

What do mean, "Where?" Are you looking for scriptures, or something?

If I knew, I would not be asking, would I?
Is not grabbing an umbrella before going out not a set of instructions on how to keep oneself dry in the rain?

It is? I thought you said it wasn't?:confused:
What if I don't grab an umbrella? What does that mean?
Also, don't we grab umbrellas because we have learned to do so at a young age?

Do the same thing, apply the definition. Simple, really.

Musta ducked when those memes were hitting us.

Could you just point out where the memes are in the whole umbrella example?
 
Last edited:
If I knew, I would not be asking, would I?

Again, I have no idea what you're looking for.

It is? I thought you said it wasn't?

I never did, why don't you try reading posts before responding?

What if I don't grab an umbrella? What does that mean?

It means that's the way you responded.

Also, don't we grab umbrellas because we have learned to do so at a young age?

Gee, didn't I say something along that line?

Read the posts, please.

Musta ducked when those memes were hitting us.

Could you just point out where the memes are in the whole umbrella example?

I did.

Ya know sam, these are the baiting responses you're so adept to providing, which ultimately frustrates many people here. Funny, you should have a thread made here about you in that regard.

Have you been listening or ignoring?
 
Again, I have no idea what you're looking for.



I never did, why don't you try reading posts before responding?



It means that's the way you responded.



Gee, didn't I say something along that line?

Read the posts, please.



I did.

Ya know sam, these are the baiting responses you're so adept to providing, which ultimately frustrates many people here. Funny, you should have a thread made here about you in that regard.

Have you been listening or ignoring?

Hmm I read it, I still can't figure it out, appreciate the effort though.
 
<< Hmm I read it, I still can't figure it out >>

Don't worry, I've looked it up and neither can Dawkins.

10/10 for honesty, Dickie!
 
<< it is not possible to know the intricacies of the meme as this newly emerged replicator is not yet fully formed and so is “drifting clumsily about in its primeval soup” (p.206, 1976). In its present vagueness, the wanton blanket-definition that allows it to “attach itself to anything else, culturally, that works” >>

Vague?...primeval soup?..can attach itself to anything....in other words a load of waffle.

It gets worse...Lewis Wolpert..

<< If you could tell me what a meme is, and how useful it is, I’d be very grateful. [Laughs] Please don’t misunderstand, I’m a great admirer of Richard Dawkins [who developed the concept of memes]. But what are memes? How do you decide whether something is a meme or not? And what you really want to understand is, how is it passed on and why does it persist? This is never discussed. So for Daniel Dennett — who’s a philosopher, after all — to get involved with memes, the moment he does that, I just stop reading him. >>

Me too...this is one meme thats going to catch on. A meme is a trendy fad theory quickly discarded but is used by internet geeks for everything and anything.
 
Last edited:
So what is a meme then? I know the "popular definition" but epistemologically it means nothing. :confused:

One new way of looking at it, which has probably developed from the meme concept is like this:

"Participatory Epistemology is a relatively new philosophical concept, paradigmatically articulated by Richard Tarnas and elaborated specifically in relation to Transpersonal psychology by Jorge Ferrer, Christopher Bache, and others. The Participatory Epistemology is constituted in the recognition that meaning is neither outside of the human mind, that is, in the "objective" world waiting to be discovered (the paradigmatically Modern/Structuralist worldview), nor that meaning is simply constructed or projected onto an inherently meaningless world by the "subjective" human mind (the paradigmatically Postmodern/Poststructuralist worldview). Rather, Tarnas argues, via Hegel, Goethe, Kuhn, Jung, and many other thinkers, that meaning is enacted through the participation of the human mind in the larger meaning of the cosmos. Thus, as in the dialectical movement that Hegel describes, the mind draws forth a meaning that exists in potentia in the cosmos, but which must go through the process of articulation by means of human consciousness. "

...actually, I kinda just called it a heritable environmental effect on memory. But that epistemological stuff sounds just nifty.
 
...actually, I kinda just called it a heritable environmental effect on memory. But that epistemological stuff sounds just nifty.

:p

heritable environmental effect on memory, huh?

'ow wuld that woik dyu tink?
 
:p

heritable environmental effect on memory, huh?

'ow wuld that woik dyu tink?

Gesundheit.

Methylation of associated regulatory elements for behaviour - adrenalin, steroids and the like.

Geoff not know specifics of fine physiological mechanics, but expects system of fine-grain modification of blunt systems; like allegorical hitting-cavewoman-just-hard-enough-to-stun-her with club. Too hard, and cannot mate; instead need readily available pit. Too soft, and cannot mate: system disrupted by angry female with lump on head.

Just right: short-term fitness assured.
 
Gesundheit.

Methylation of associated regulatory elements for behaviour - adrenalin, steroids and the like.

Begging the question, which comes foist, the adrenaline surge or the emotion that leads to it?
 
Usually, the bear chasing you occurs first. But if you had a bear chasing you, would you run into a mosque or a market?

Your primitive human emotions are nothing more than overidealized biochemical reactions.
 
Usually, the bear chasing you occurs first. But if you had a bear chasing you, would you run into a mosque or a market?

Your primitive human emotions are nothing more than overidealized biochemical reactions.

Oh you!!!!
axe.gif


Sure but does the fear cause the flight or fight?

If so, what presents the emotion?

PS Are you a giant dick?
 
Back
Top