Erm, they do. But in this case we are not dealing with some abstract change; we are dealing with a propaganda onslaught by a privileged minority. It hardly matters what the minority is; such behaviour is not compatible with liberty or democracy. Why vote, if the critical issues of the age are decided by the back door and no dissent permitted.
I wonder how long before we get real fascism again, nationalistic but socialist? Not long, I would say, if I read the trends aright. When that happens, you will regret establishing the principle that the people don't matter, and that dissent may be silenced without a qualm. Times change, you know; and change very quickly.
It may be "accepted" that a man may go through a mock ceremony of marriage with another man, an animal, or his wrist. But if you mean YOU accept it, more fool you. And I don't accept it. And most people don't. Which is why the activists didn't try to put it to a vote.
These kinds of argument are not different in kind those of a Nazi yelling at someone who objects to persecuting the Jews. The tone, the arguments ... all are identical. (And, in our wretched society, we are now not even allowed to make this simile without some gullible fool mouthing "Godwin's law" - ask yourself just why the establishment would create a meme to silence that comparison, and tremble)
But of course to those who merely worship convenience, and care nothing for logic, reason, science, morality or anything else, except as it is useful... words are merely a tool to beat people with.
Think for yourselves. Do you imagine that the establishment has chosen to make us all kowtow to a vile vice, out of any motive other than spite? Or that YOU are the intended beneficiaries?
And the treatment of Jan Ardena in here is not markedly different to that which a negro showing up at a club in the pre-war deep south might have received. Shame on all those trying this lynch-mob treatment.