well at least draqon stopped trying to spread falsehoods
well at least draqon stopped trying to spread Polish falsehoods
I am just watching a movie now.
is it a propaganda flick? you seem to be the sort into those
nah, some japanese anime post-apocalyptic thing
No you just go ahead and do it. In Vietnam for instance.
Duh!
grave of the fireflies?
grave of the fireflies?
no, "Future Boy Conan"
So your saying the logic of these people is that they are so pissed off that a cartoon is the straw that backs their back? If a cartoon can do that then I don't think anything we do period won't piss them off.
Its so very easy to denounce the enemy, denouncing your own behavior is the hard part. I denounce American occupation it goes against the fundamental ideals of freedom and human dignity that my country claims it stands for... see it's not hard for me too do it, now you try it, say "I denounce terrorism by Muslims as both morally wrong and not sanctioned by Islamic ideals"
Yep, soo what is your point? Should the terrorist be given a free ride is that what you saying? I don't have a problem with ending American neo-colonialism, but we got to end terrorism at the same time, we got to bring those on BOTH sides to justice.
Muslims are the most unpopular group in american. American don't hate rain forest tribal people for killing oil workers and loggers, in fact Americans usually side with them, why is that? Every time Americans see Muslims dancing in the street because someone blew him self up in a crowed market or in a school or protesting over a cartoon, many Americans think "gee maybe these people deserve being oppressed" when Americans saw Muslims dancing over 9/11 what happen, did Americans re-think their place in the world, pull out support for Israel and pull out their military forces from bases in Muslim countries? No!, support for Israel increased! America bombed and invaded 2 countries!!! Thoughtless violence only begets more thoughtless violence! I swear if we have another large scale terrorist attack on American soil, iran will be reduced to a crater of melted radioactive sand, I don't want that, do you want that?
You answered if terrorism is morally right? I defined the parameters of what constitutes terrorism pretty clearly, I would think a yes/no answer would be possible. I was simply asking for the morality of it, no who gets blamed or what, all you have said has been to revert to blaming the US, which is deserved but it does not answer the morality question. Ultimately you can't demand change affectively without diplomatics: you have to say "yes terrorism is wrong, we both want to end terrorism, lets do it by ending occupation" you have to show the other side your morally superior by admitting fault first, that opens them up to your proposal... or you can keep being angry and unreasonable, only encouraging animosity and more killing.
I am not out to convince people like Mr G and Buffalo Roam. These are the people who would destroy entire countries for greed and ideology and then cry if anyone destroyed a couple of buildings in return. They are more concerned with their hangnails than the dead children they scatter over the globe.
As for demonising, this thread is a good example. How does anyone know the bombing was due to the cartoons? Or that it was even by the Taliban? We don't. But it does not matter, does it?
I generally agree with your take on the greater evils.diamond said:You think 1.7 billion Muslims in the world are oblivious to the deaths and rapes of their brothers and sisters? How naive do you think we are?
I generally agree with your take on the greater evils.
But if you think you have 1.7 billion brothers and sisters, all alike under Western oppression because they are Muslims, you are extremely naive.
And such claims reinforce the Western stereotypification, otherwise objectionable to you, that any Muslims represent them all.
Meanwhile, this emphasis on rapes and propaganda (cartoons!) is not persuasive to Westerners.
Your treatment of women - that is, the treatment of women by those you call "brothers and sisters" - is not justifiable within reason (your sense of "honor" is an insanity, and modesty a misogynistic perversion),
and your obvious inability to comprehend Western notions of freedom of expression etc undermines the reasonableness of your other accusations.
These are lesser evils, I think, even to you. Why not avoid getting stuck on them, in discussions ?
In matters of colonial power and arrogance, injustice and illegitimacy, you have common cause and common grounds of persuasion with most Americans certainly, and Westerners in general.
That kind of distorted fixation perhaps explains the use of mass rape by the Pakistanis against the Bangladeshis, and similar events, but it will generally appear to be a perversion to a Westerner.diamond said:To Muslims, the rape of women is a crime of unimaginable horror and agony. Perhaps it is not so in the West.
We are not the ones making a big deal out of somebody's cartoons. You are. If you want attention for the more important factors, drop the cartoons. There is no connection, for us, and there will not be one.diamond said:As far as cartoon protests, Western people seem to simplify and ignore the more importance factors
Your culture doesn't. Not by my standards. Do you wish to base your arguments on my acceptance of your culture's standards ? You won't get far.diamond said:As a matter of fact, the men in my family treat women quite fine , if not better than most Western people treat their wives.
You overestimate the role of ignorance in Western opinions, and underestimate the role of differing cultural insights. The Western cultures have areas of deeper understanding, just as the Islamic cultures do, and your recommending such inquiries to me shows an unfamiliarity with an area of them. I have listened to Muslim women, and not only public figures such as Hirsti Ali or the many others who share her opinions. Have you read, with an open mind, the feminist philosophers of the West ?diamond said:You really should ask Muslim women, in person if you are able, about their views concerning the questions you raised. It can be quite insightful for you to learn the truth in this matter.
You are never going to get a Westerner to view the Danish cartoons as part of an organized campaign of humiliation. That is not a truth we are denying, but a delusion of your own. You wallow in it. Why ?diamond said:Would you have supported the Nazis in making propaganda cartoons against the Jews while they were incinerating them?
I am much more familiar with that context than you are, apparently. The context in which they are received is another matter.diamond said:Context. In what context where these cartoons published? Think about it.
Many thousands do already, in the Western countries.diamond said:I have strong doubts, however, that Muslims will again be allowed to live as independent people for the next few decades, or even centuries.
Correct, a crime by the woman who was raped, who allowed it to happen either by not being with a male relative, or dressing provocatively.DiamondHearts said:To Muslims, the rape of women is a crime of unimaginable horror and agony. Perhaps it is not so in the West.
That kind of distorted fixation perhaps explains the use of mass rape by the Pakistanis against the Bangladeshis, and similar events, but it will generally appear to be a perversion to a Westerner.
The Western powers are not using rape as the Pakistanis did, in an organized tactic against the population (that is, outside of the torture prisons) and will regard your rhetoric as melodramatic exaggeration of the significance of even serious crime - the use of emotional appeals for a cynical political agenda.
We are not the ones making a big deal out of somebody's cartoons. You are. If you want attention for the more important factors, drop the cartoons. There is no connection, for us, and there will not be one.
Your culture doesn't. Not by my standards. Do you wish to base your arguments on my acceptance of your culture's standards ? You won't get far.
You overestimate the role of ignorance in Western opinions, and underestimate the role of differing cultural insights. The Western cultures have areas of deeper understanding, just as the Islamic cultures do, and your recommending such inquiries to me shows an unfamiliarity with an area of them. I have listened to Muslim women, and not only public figures such as Hirsti Ali or the many others who share her opinions. Have you read, with an open mind, the feminist philosophers of the West ?
You are never going to get a Westerner to view the Danish cartoons as part of an organized campaign of humiliation. That is not a truth we are denying, but a delusion of your own. You wallow in it. Why ?
Many thousands do already, in the Western countries.
Why would Muslim people disrespect and abuse their mothers, sisters, wives, daughters, and women relatives? It doesn't make any sense and is another front of ignorance which Westerners often take to vilify Islam and Muslims.
IIRC, the husband got 300 lashes and 6 months in prison.
DiamondHearts said:Why would Muslim people disrespect and abuse their mothers, sisters, wives, daughters, and women relatives? It doesn't make any sense...
I don't know of any country where they can prosecute for domestic violence unless the victim presses charges, do you?