Congratulations America - you got the president you deserve

Fortunate me! I don't worship a rapist and a felon. I am very thankful I am not like you.
I don’t believe he is a rapist or a felon.
I believe the DOJ was weaponised against him.

What’s funny is that Joe Biden is now claiming Lawfare against his son, who is most likely guilty of everything he is accused of.
But we’ll have to wait and see, as things will surely come to light within the next year.

You see that’s how grown ups conduct things. They look for the ACTUAL evidence.

Live and learn woke boy
 
I don’t believe he is a rapist or a felon.
I know. You don't want to believe you support rapists and felons; it causes cognitive dissonance. So you reject reality and substitute right wing misinformation, copied straight from right wing media.

But here in reality, you support a rapist. I am very glad I don't support rapists, and I am very glad I don't have to lie to myself as you are doing.

I believe the DOJ was weaponised against him.

Yep. "All the women are lying" "he never said that" "locker room talk" "he was kidding" "weaponized justice" "lawfare" "she's a c*nt" "she's a whore" "she's ugly" "no one would want to have sex with her" "he never met her" "she's jealous" - we've heard all the excuses rapists use before.

All that matters is what a jury decides. And two juries - juries he himself helped pick - determined that he was lying when he said he didn't rape her. End of story.

They look for the ACTUAL evidence.

And unfortunately for Trump, the courts had that evidence. Which is how we now know he is a rapist.
 
And unfortunately for Trump, the courts had that evidence. Which is how we now know he is a rapist.
I don’t see how…
There’s no way of telling if he was even there, what to speak of raping her.

Do you think it is possible that she made this up?
If you don’t think it was possible, can you please give a reason why?
 
I’m okay to wait and see what happens in the next 2 years ;)
No matter what happens, no matter how much your life changes for the worse, no matter how many facts are put in front of you, you'll swallow and regurgitate the lies of Fox News and deny reality, just like you do now. ;)
 
There's no way for YOU to tell. The jury had access to much more reality-based evidence than you do.
I think we know what the jury know as reporters allowed in the courts have specified.

If we weren’t privy to “special evidence” that was omitted from the public, how would you know there was extra evidence?
 
No matter what happens, no matter how much your life changes for the worse, no matter how many facts are put in front of you, you'll swallow and regurgitate the lies of Fox News and deny reality, just like you do now. ;)
This is straight up TDS.
You assume your fears are correct because you hate Trump.
 
I don’t see how…
There’s no way of telling if he was even there, what to speak of raping her.
And what of the persons she confided in at the time--that is, some 30 years ago.

ANd what of the two dozen plus other allegations, many from 30 to 40 years--and allegations were made at the time, and in most instances their claims are also supported by persons whom they confided in, as well.

Why are you ignoring all of this? What is your "informed" and "considered" take on all of these other allegations?
 
If we weren’t privy to “special evidence” that was omitted from the public, how would you know there was extra evidence?
Not "special evidence", which we are not privy to, just more thorough details. How old are you? How do you not know this stuff?

Or, are you simply being dishonest here, and the reality is you are simply a rape supporter, a misogynist, and, in all statistical likelihood, a sexual assailant and/or rapist yourself?
 
Therefore it's not legally correct to keep calling him a rapist, is it?
You really don't put a whole lot of effort into trying to convince us that you are not, in fact, a racist and a misogynist, do you?

Why not just own it? We know exactly what you are--who are you trying to convince here?
 
That’s not what I said, nor is it what I meant.

Yeah, you're not exactly reliable.

For all anyone knows I may be a person of low self-esteem, and go into a deep depression, even end up taking his advice.
Yet all he gets is a warning.

Maybe, if you're a person of low self-esteem, rape advocacy is not advisable behavior.

Moreover, look, if you have to misrepresent what goes on in courtrooms in order to have a point, you're doing it wrong; people like you are the reason the judge took the unusual step of clarifying publicly that yes, the Carroll verdict meant Donald Trump was determined, by a court, to have committed rape.

So, for all anyone knows, you may be just a troll saying offensive things to be offensive. That description would also match your behavior. And it's not even a coin toss; it's easy to be both, just do the one as part of the other.

(And while telling someone KYS is, generally, only a severe offense depending on who is saying it to whom, the problem with saying it at all is that truth should suffice: It's true, the world would be better off without rape advocates. It's not that they need to kill themselves, but, rather, change. It is, however, also true that if they don't change, then the world really does get a little less awful when they do finally die. So, please, live on and live well, but that latter also includes being a better person than the front you show us.)​

Also remember, Donald Trump is on tape actually bragging about being a sex offender.
 
Yeah, you're not exactly reliable.
That response has nothing to do with the quote you are responding to.
Moreover, look, if you have to misrepresent what goes on in courtrooms in order to have a point, you're doing it wrong; people like you are the reason the judge took the unusual step of clarifying publicly that yes, the Carroll verdict meant Donald Trump was determined, by a court, to have committed rape.
You think?
I think he was part of a conspiracy to interfere with the upcoming general election. Along with all the other attempts. Maybe you missed all that.
Miscarriage's of justice is nothing new.
Maybe Kash Patel will shed light on it one way or the other. We shall see.
So, for all anyone knows, you may be just a troll saying offensive things to be offensive. That description would also match your behavior. And it's not even a coin toss; it's easy to be both, just do the one as part of the other
Maybe I’m not a troll.
Maybe I’m being branded a troll because I’m going against the general consensus.
We know that some Democrats cannot stand the fact that The Donald is back in the Whitehouse, with a team that will change the current status quo, and bring normality back to a country sick and tired of woke nonsense.
 
Back
Top