Common Ancestors?

I

IceAgeCivilizations

Banned
Banned
The term "common ancestor" is often used by Darwinists to explain the origins of creatures, so here's a couple for you Darwinists:

What is the supposed common ancestor of the monkey and the human, and what is the supposed common ancestor of the monkey and the fish?
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
Because you give a vague and actually silly answer makes me a troll? Go figure.
Click to expand...

The answer makes perfect sense to me.

Picture a tree.
The leaf is you.
Follow it back and eventually you get to the trunk.
Along the way, you will pass branches.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
The term "common ancestor" is often used by Darwinists to explain the origins of creatures, so here's a couple for you Darwinists:

What is the supposed common ancestor of the monkey and the human, and what is the supposed common ancestor of the monkey and the fish?
Click to expand...

The common ancestor of the modern monkey and mankind probably resembled a monkey. It is not any living creature, so it doesn't have a name, is that what you are looking for?

The common ancestor of the monkey and the fish is more vague since it was so long ago. It probably looked more like a fish or a worm of some sort.
 
It's strange that the supposed immediate ancestors of various creatures are there, but they're not there, kind of a "now you see it now you don't" kind of a deal, rather perplexing.
 
The pre-monkey-man's name was Gerald. The pre-fish-monkey's name was Princess Hyperion. Hope that helps.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
It's strange that the supposed immediate ancestors of various creatures are there, but they're not there, kind of a "now you see it now you don't" kind of a deal, rather perplexing.
Click to expand...

Many have been found in the fossil record.

Of course, there's a very good reason why many common ancestor species no longer exist today: their descendants have out-competed them for the same ecological niche. That's one way that extinction happens.

Only a creationist would be silly enough to believe that all forms of life that have ever existed must still exist today.

In fact, over 99% of all species that have ever existed on Earth are extinct.
 
ICA said:
Hardly, you've got to be kidding.
Click to expand...
That is known for higher - multicellular - beings. It is less certain for bacteria, etc - but it's certainly the way to bet.

ICA said:
It's strange that the supposed immediate ancestors of various creatures are there, but they're not there,
Click to expand...
It's more of a "they were there long ago, they aren't here now" deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top