Quantum Quack said:
If one puts the entire work of the Bible in context with what is defined as real,
you can see that there is a problem in inspiring confidence in it's validity?
To any one that requires more than just the proof of the written word.
Then it becomes a philosophical ontological question. Where do we get
any proof from? Things like confidence and hope are matters of
faith, and the Bible works from that premise - but it doesn't end in it.
Before you get to upset let me put my comment in context.
"The proof of God's will is shown in the actions of humanity" Not just a small part of humanity but in the whole of humanity in all of time not just 2000 years ago."
That's true in a sense - we should evaluate claims about God within a
human context as well. We have no choice but to be subjective. That's why I don't have problems with many versions of the Flood story, etc. But, we can't throw away what has been achieved by that enquiry either. When people realized that they were acting separately from God's wishes, and began trying to compensate for it by rituals and sacrifices, they had to deal with the fact that everything that happens isn't God's will. They did this in various ways and using various philosophies, but the problem remains the driving force behind religion. Humanity had to find out which actions showed (reflected) God's will and which didn't.
And this simply
cannot be done in isolation from God. If God doesn't
tell us at some point what He considers progress and what He considers sin, we can never know where we stand. The problem now is that those who start from the premise that God doesn't exist have to believe that nothing has been said, and ironically, as a result exclude themselves from the possibility of revelation; and those who have the approach you suggest above: that we should listen to
everything, can only think what might have been said is lost in the noise of human voices.
God's Word
does cut across nations and cultures in its application and its truth - but its source is only Him, and its entry point starts where
He chooses. A blood transfusion needs to be administered only topically, with blood of the same type - and the heart spreads to the whole body. A single impurity can be fatal. From the heart of God to the heart of man, there is only one route, and only one acceptable blood type - exactly
because it needs to be compatible with
all life.
Strange as it may sound, my confidence in the Bible does not come from the Bible. If that was all I had, I would really have had nothing. It's not true because it's written down, it was written down because it's true. But that's not all there is to it.