Can you really blame these people?

[Norsefire]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0ecvsHzlfk

This next one is hilarious at the part with the chair

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INccVzfn4L4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUk_4wCtv8I

I can't say I blame them. I'd probably have done the same.:shrug:

 

[Asguard]

barbaians. There trials will be short

 

[Norsefire]

How can you call them barbarians? I bet you'd have done the same thing if it were your daughter or friend was murdered.

 

[kenworth]

i wouldve let the guy whos kid was killed go.gave him a minute or two.

 

[madanthonywayne]

barbaians. There trials will be short

Pftt. Trials? Do you really think they'll even be charged with anything? I doubt it. Their actions are perfectly understandable. Especially those drive by guys who killed the kid. What a gutless move a drive by shooting is! Just driving by the house shooting randomly because you don't have the balls to go after the guy one on one? Or the patience to simply wait for him to come out of the house and attack him directly?

I say anyone convicted of a drive by shooting should be put to death even if no one was killed.

 

[Norsefire]

I agree madanthonywayne.

 

[S.A.M.]

I submit the people killed should be labelled collateral damages or insurgents and the "heroes" shooting from a distance elected President.

 

[Norsefire]

SAM are you sure you posted in the right thread?

 

[S.A.M.]

Whats teh difference between a drive by shooting and a guy bombing "insurgents" from 10,000 feet?

 

[Norsefire]

Whats teh difference between a drive by shooting and a guy bombing "insurgents" from 10,000 feet?

The insurgents are military targets.

 

[S.A.M.]

Which makes the guys shooting at people they cannot identify and who cannot defend themselves, in their own country, military heroes. Same as any drive by.

 

[Norsefire]

Which makes the guys shooting at people they cannot identify and who cannot defend themselves, in their own country, military heroes. Same as any drive by.

No because the drive by's are against civilians and innocent people. Insurgents are not civilians.

 

[S.A.M.]

No because the drive by's are against civilians and innocent people. Insurgents are not civilians.

Insurgents are civilians. Especially when they are attending weddings, sitting in schools and mainly minding their own business in their own homes or their own country.

 

[Norsefire]

Insurgents are civilians. Especially when they are attending weddings, sitting in schools and mainly minding their own business in their own homes or their own country.

No, insurgents are terrorists. The people you described are not insurgents.

 

[S.A.M.]

You cannot be a terrorist when you fight an invader in your own country. Thats complete nonsense.

 

[Asguard]

my point was from watching the video the guy hadnt been found guilty.

 

[S.A.M.]

See? There you go.

 

[Norsefire]

You cannot be a terrorist when you fight an invader in your own country. Thats complete nonsense.

True; however you can be a terrorist when your goal is hurting civilians

my point was from watching the video the guy hadnt been found guilty.

Pfft.........and if he had been? I bet you'd have wanted to have a go at him as well

 

[S.A.M.]

True; however you can be a terrorist when your goal is hurting civilians

That would be every person who bombs a place knowing civilians will surely die.

 

[Norsefire]

That would be every person who bombs a place knowing civilians will surely die.

Then such a person would be a terrorist. Therefore the war in Iraq is a war of terrorists vs terrorists.:shrug: