mario said:
OK
mario said:
1) If god cannot be or create evil, then where does it ultimately come from? Free choice you say? But god created that as well. If "we" are the only ones that can create evil then we are like gods ourselves. For we can create something that god cannot.
If God created us with the ability to do Evil, that does not necessarily make him Evil or mean that he created Evil. A pen can be used to kill someone. Does that make the inventor of the pen guilty of murder?
As for thge other question, another anology... Spiders can create webs, but we can not. Does that make spiders like us? I don't get the connection.
mario said:
2) Why does free choice have to involve a choice between good and evil? Why the extremes? For choice to exist all you need are two options to choose from. One can be "good" and the other can be "neutral". An example of this would be if you happened upon a street person begging for money. You can exert your free will by either being "good" and drop a few coin in his lap...or you can be "neutral" by just walking by and ignore him (which most of us do anyway). Why should the option of "evil", like beating the crap out of this poor person and stealing what little money he has, be even there? Evil does NOT have to be there...just "neutrality".
It doesn't HAVE to be. Most people will either put money in or walk by.
(Although many will argue that not putting money in is Evil. In fact by the reasoning in this very argument, they must argue so, because they are saying the if God does not actively help the suffering, then he is Evil, so if YOU do not directly help the suffering than YOU are Evil. That's a tangent we can tackle later, though.)
As I was saying, most people will either put money in, or just walk by.
If, however, we do not have the option to beat him up, or do whatever else we want to him, then we simply do not have free will.
God did not create these hostile selfish societies that performs violence on their neighbors, nevermind their own brothers, MAN did.
MAN created societies that allow people to go hungry while others swim in the wealth they gained from exploiting those very people who are starving.
MAN created money.
MAN created guns.
MAN is responsible for his own actions.
To blame it on God would not only be unfair to God, it would be excusing the bastards that ARE responsible for this and allowing them to get away with not taking accountability for their actions.
It is disrespectful to the homeless person, because if it is God's fault, we are not responsible for feeding him.
It's disgusting.
mario said:
3) Does god have free choice? If so, is one of the options that he can choose from "evil"? If we need evil to understand what good is all about then how does god understand his goodness? Being nothing but goodness, he can't possibly conceive what evil is...let alone try to make US understand the difference between the two.
Why wouldn't he be able to comprehend what evil is?
I don't understand your reasoning.
Omnibenevolent does not mean "nothing but goodness" it means "performing only good or charitable actions".
He could very well understand evil and simply chose not to partake in it (JUST AS WE CAN, but most of us, obviously, do not).
mario said:
4) Can you be all knowing (omniscent) and still have free choice? Can you think about choosing between two options if you already know what you will choose in the end anyway?
Your question assumes that omniscient necessarily implies knowledge of the future.
I don't think it does.
I will link
to this again (in case you want to read why I think that).