They don't want to massacre the jews they want their fucking country back. They got fucked because they didn't want a bunch of jews who wanted dominion over them. They got fucked for wanting immigrants who build on the current society rather than destroying it.
Bigotry: argument by numbers
- Thread starter S.A.M.
- Start date
They don't want to massacre the jews they want their fucking country back. They got fucked because they didn't want a bunch of jews who wanted dominion over them. They got fucked for wanting immigrants who build on the current society rather than destroying it.
The Palestinian refugees will not get to reside in their former territories. As long as they continue to kill innocent people to achieve this goal, they will continue to be occupied, pursued, arrested, and as a last resort, killed. :bawl:
Because people like you are against the rights of victims of Israel.
Innocent Israelis is almost an oxymoron. They almost all support the dispossession of palestinians. If Israel doesn't wish to be attacked they need to cease their crimes. No matter how much you wish it other wise the Palestinians acts are a response. Israel needs to go bye bye and a state that can act like an adult and treat all of its peoples as equal needs to happen. but your against that.
and last resort is a fucking joke. The Israelis use lethal force against the palestinians every chance they get.
Last edited:
thanks for once again proving you bigotry against the palestinians. You would never think of saying such a thing about the tibitians or any number of african peoiple.
I'm defining what I consider bigotry about his position and why I agree with the small number of Jews who share my views. And since all my arguments are taken directly from them (with links embedded for source), I do not consider it as a "fleeting reference"
I also do not consider a wide ranging Jewish consensus on the sustenance of the "Jewish" character of Occupied Palestine through various embedded lobbies in powerful nations as "diverse political views"
Last edited:
It's amusing just how uninformed you like to be.
FIDO?I've already illustrated for you my opposition to settlements and major military confrontations.
Do you consider your own racism as "counterbalanced" by your perception of Israeli racism?
Your spelling is dropping off again. Perhaps you need another award.
Anyway: how do you arrive at this figure? From which buttocks was it produced?
Oh, now I see what you're caterwauling about. Again, you've misunderstood my position. I would gladly support such a right, so long as there was some assurance that the situation wouldn't devolve into an all-out civil war. You failed to provide any such assurances - in fact, your opinion was "tough titty". As you consider yourself a "progressive" on this issue, I can say that my belief in any such prospect is very slim.
I hope that answers all your questions.
Still, I'm sure you could generate some insults out of it.
You think the human rights of Palestinians are up for debate? Conditional? Secondary to their occupiers?
No they depend on there being a war. Are you nuts?
And I've already specified that with Palestinian return, there would probably be another war, and which you've specified earlier wouldn't bother you at all. Thanks for coming round full circle, which saves me the typing.
I think we're done here. Could a mod close the thread? Really no need to continue.
I think we're done here. Could a mod close the thread? Really no need to continue.
Nope, because the war would be instigated by the Jews. So its the Palestinians who would be victims again. The Palestinians are not the ones who have a history of exceptionalism. Its like the allies bombing Germany. Racism dies hard.