Pangea breaking apart to the present positions of the continents, steam venting in magma through the midoceanic rift zones for most of the Deluge water, the sedimentary (deposited in water) layers which compose the almost all of the sedimentary geologic column on the continents, all reasons to rightly opine that 1 year for that makes far more sense than 14 days.
Finally. Did that hurt? Did it do you any harm whatsoever to write that? Did I ask for too much? Was it worth going three or four posts avoiding an answer that was that simple? (You don't need to answer these).
Here is the inherent flaw in what you've said:
All of a sudden you try and involve science. Why have you not done that before? If you were going to bring science into the equation we wouldn't have got past the first page of the bible let alone to the global flood saga.
As we're talking science now though:
There is no evidence to suggest a global flood ever happened. That's all there is to it IAC. If we're going to talk science do it properly. Don't start on water evaporation etc until you understand the amount of water fall needed to cover the earth to such depth in the first place - and how that water fall would have annihilated anyone on a bloody boat to begin with.
You work this entire story on the basis of magic, of spells and gods, of a click of the fingers - and yet when called upon it you have the audacity to try and rely on science? Do me a lemon, you're taking the absolute piss.
How comes a sky fairy can click his fingers and start a global flood, a boat can carry millions of animals without hassle and yet for some reason science dictates that a globe full of water cannot evaporate etc in 14 days and so that all of a sudden puts end to any 14 day claim? I've never been forced to smell such bullshit in all my days.
Tell me now IAC so we can get this clear... Would you like to engage in this discussion from a scientific standpoint or a mystical one? Science or god.. take your pick.
You know as well as I do that you can't say "science" because you wouldn't get past the first sentence. Now I know why you didn't answer, (I knew already). The minute you tried to bring science into the game the minute you knew you'd have a major problem.
Now, from a non-science perspective.. which is the only way we would have anything to discuss in the first place... What exactly makes a 1 year flood more viable than a 14 day flood? (No, you cannot use science as an answer).
A cuneiform tablet from each of those patriarchs, the tablets were passed down through the generations to Moses.
So where are those tablets now? Are you pulling them from out of your head or are there actual tablets, (other than Sumerian/Chaldean ones), that support your claim? Oh please, a minute ago you seemed to be into science, into factual data.. now you have nothing more than personal belief. It's sickening.
The old city names were on the cuneiform tablets which Moses received, get a grip.
I would like to "get a grip" on those tablets. Where are they exactly?
Now make a logical objection or stop posting.
Now you're being plain silly. £10 says my entire post goes ignored.
