Not even remotely.
Just ask the resident theists - they generally consider me an atheist.
That's only when you go on your anti-theist rants (like the ones that got you banned). They take your criticism of theists (not theism, mind you--theists) as coming from an atheistic position. Otherwise, people tend to think you're a theist of some sort.
The problem is with those people (be they theists or atheists) who desire to neatly box and label others, based on as little information as they like.
Oh give it a rest. The reason people think you're a theist is because you present yourself as one. You speak of the oneness of God, the necessity of an afterlife, and the intrinsic failings of any philosophy that doesn't put a smile on your face and grant you persistent peace. And when pressed, you reduce yourself to sarcastic quips and relevant emoticons, never answering a question about yourself directly. Look at this business here, with you feigning shock and offense at a charge you hear regularly here at Sciforums, as if you've never heard it before. In reality, you're being hostile to Cris precisely because you do hear it regularly.
And you wonder why people are "wrong" about you (supposedly). Maybe if you weren't so evasive, people would have a better understanding. Instead, it falls to me and others who are all too familiar with your routine to straighten them out. For example: Wynn is a seeker who believes that a god must exist, and that god is specifically the deity of Abraham, but hasn't had a revelation and can't find a particular religion that suits her in the meantime.