Astronomical Architecture of Great Pyramid

IceAgeCivilizations said:
440 Royal Cubits (20.632 inches per Cubit) per base side of the Great Pyramid of Giza, 280 for the height, so two base sides, 880, divided by 280, equals Pi, and the base perimeter length of the Great Pyramid is half a nautical mile, so it's a reduction of the dimensions fo the Earth by a factor of 43,200, derived from the rate of precession, 72 years per 1 degree of 360 degrees.

The ancients measured the radius of the Earth, according to the rate of precession, by measuring one side of a hexagon which is circumscribed by the circle of the Earth, and subdivided this length by 7,200 for the base perimeter length of the Great Pyramid, and therefrom, the length of the royal cubit.
Click to expand...

The pyramids aren't even that perfect. The first few pyramids built were failures. (the first pharaoh to build large pyramids built three in his lifetime). One was abandoned when the foundations started to shift, the next one had to be changed when the grand-chamber started cracking. This is the pyramid with the change in slope 2/3rds of the way up. They did this to reduce the mass above the chamber. (this was before they figured out how to arch with corbels)

I've seen studies of the use of phi in pyramids that were debunked when new measurements were taken of the pyramids and found out that the original numbers were fudged. A lot of this nonsense math comes from false beginnings.

The best way to debunk this crap is to study ancient Egypt. There is no mystery regarding the pyramids. Before the Old Kingdom, there was an Archaeic period where kings were build under large stone structures. All Egyptians tried to bury themselves under stone, because the sand would shift and expose bodies, and there was the threat of high Nile floods. These large stone structures got bigger and bigger, and the only way to make things really large, and be structurally stable, is with a pyramid. That's why the same shape has been discovered by dozens of different cultures. It has to do with properties of the shape, NOT with anything going on with the cultures. Dump a bucket of sand on the ground slowly to see this for yourself.

The reason the pyramids were only built during the Old Kingdom was because those graves were robbed and decimated during the first intermediate period. Middle Kingdom pharaohs realized that these pyramids were a TAD obvious, and the Valley of the Kings was born. (not that these fared any better during the second intermediary period. Only a few were not found and robbed)


The true story of the pyramids is better than any of the bullshit alien conspiracy theories. Too bad the pseudo-intellectual waste their time on fiction, when reality is far more fascinating.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
About 4,200 years old.
Click to expand...

Not quite my friend! you see the stones according to geologists that make up the great pyramid and the sphinx are far older than 4000 BC let alone the civilization of Egypt. Geologists date the stones to be carved out from the last ice age about 10,500 BC. The stone itself is harder than the copper tools used bt the builders to chip it as claimed by egyptologists!
 
swivel said:
The pyramids aren't even that perfect. The first few pyramids built were failures. (the first pharaoh to build large pyramids built three in his lifetime). One was abandoned when the foundations started to shift, the next one had to be changed when the grand-chamber started cracking. This is the pyramid with the change in slope 2/3rds of the way up. They did this to reduce the mass above the chamber. (this was before they figured out how to arch with corbels)

I've seen studies of the use of phi in pyramids that were debunked when new measurements were taken of the pyramids and found out that the original numbers were fudged. A lot of this nonsense math comes from false beginnings.

The best way to debunk this crap is to study ancient Egypt. There is no mystery regarding the pyramids. Before the Old Kingdom, there was an Archaeic period where kings were build under large stone structures. All Egyptians tried to bury themselves under stone, because the sand would shift and expose bodies, and there was the threat of high Nile floods. These large stone structures got bigger and bigger, and the only way to make things really large, and be structurally stable, is with a pyramid. That's why the same shape has been discovered by dozens of different cultures. It has to do with properties of the shape, NOT with anything going on with the cultures. Dump a bucket of sand on the ground slowly to see this for yourself.

The reason the pyramids were only built during the Old Kingdom was because those graves were robbed and decimated during the first intermediate period. Middle Kingdom pharaohs realized that these pyramids were a TAD obvious, and the Valley of the Kings was born. (not that these fared any better during the second intermediary period. Only a few were not found and robbed)


The true story of the pyramids is better than any of the bullshit alien conspiracy theories. Too bad the pseudo-intellectual waste their time on fiction, when reality is far more fascinating.
Click to expand...

You need to go take a good look at them first dude and then let science spell ot the rest!
 
Vega said:
Not quite my friend! you see the stones according to geologists that make up the great pyramid and the sphinx are far older than 4000 BC let alone the civilization of Egypt. Geologists date the stones to be carved out from the last ice age about 10,500 BC. The stone itself is harder than the copper tools used bt the builders to chip it as claimed by egyptologists!
Click to expand...

You are completely and utterly incorrect. Experimental archaeology has been conducted to determine man-hours needed to do the construction. The used copper chisels and wooden wedges and quarried rock in the exact way mentioned in Egyptian texts. Moreover, when geologists "date stones" they are dating the stone, not when it was quarried. There is no evidence in the geology of the stones that indicate the Great Pyramid is any older than the dynasty its placed in.
 
The hypothesis, that the dimensions of the great pyramids were crafted to reflect the dimensions and orientation of the Earth, and that therefore the Egyptians had more knowledge about astronomy and mathmatics than we ordinarily give them credit for, is plausable.
 
Such mathematical abilities should show up elsewhere, other than the pyramids. Do they?(I honestly don't know- now i'm curious grr)
 
Stonehenge was a precession clock, as was the "Wildcat's Pile of Stones" on the Golan Heights, and along with the Celtic Cross for measuring precession, there was Maui's Tanawa, the Mayan Staff of Power, and the Antikythera Device.

And precession numbers are in ancient legends and architectures of seemingly disparate ancient people groups.
 
I think he means among the Egyptians. If they knew the Earth's size and regularly divided it into seconds of arc, this should show up elsewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top