Are you content with the way this site is run?

How well do you think that moderators moderate?

  • Very Well.

    Votes: 12 38.7%
  • Well.

    Votes: 9 29.0%
  • OK

    Votes: 4 12.9%
  • Badly

    Votes: 4 12.9%
  • Terrible

    Votes: 2 6.5%

  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Im not happy about the hamster thats powering the server. cant we replace it?

Hamster-inside-computer.jpg
 




glaucon said:
Dear Gustav,

You have received an infraction at SciForums.com.

Reason: Insulted Other Member(s)
-------

-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
[post]2505925[/post]
No, actually, it's a simple matter of enforcing the rules.


ah yes
the letter of the law rather than the spirit
right wing nazi pigs would be proud

heil!

so ah
can we think of real life laws that exist on the books but are rarely or never enforced? if sodomy laws still exist in some state statutes, will our resident nazi pigs go hunting hot babes that like it like that?

oh i got one....10 over the speed limit is the unspoken rule
there are of course a few anally retentive pigs that will pull your ass over
they are of course, few and far between

just like sci
casual and lax in the rules dept
until that that...glaucon fella happened by

/spits

oy, glaucon
that is an addled brained statement. y'know, stupid beyond belief

/shudders/cracks up

All the best,
SciForums.com


glaucon called sam's statement stupid.
according to him, it is permissible

i call his statement stupid
according to him, it is infractionable

what a disgusting double standard
quite unconscionable
 
So, the poll consensus is:

Moderators moderate well to very well: 68%
Moderation is ok: 13%
Moderation is bad or terrible: 19%

I think we can close this thread now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top