Are you content with the way this site is run?

How well do you think that moderators moderate?

  • Very Well.

    Votes: 12 38.7%

  • Well.

    Votes: 9 29.0%

  • OK

    Votes: 4 12.9%

  • Badly

    Votes: 4 12.9%

  • Terrible

    Votes: 2 6.5%
  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Trippy said:
The phrase "What a silly question" is not an ad-hominem. It might be mildly insulting, but it's the question that is silly, not the person asking it.]
Click to expand...

There are no silly questions, only silly people who think there are such things as silly questions.
 
I would have voted Very Well..but there are people like breast milk drinkers like stateofmind and and whiners like WillisNever running around still..so they're not doing their jobs entirely.
 
glaucon said:
No, actually, it's a simple matter of enforcing the rules.

Not very smart of you Gustav.
Enjoy your holiday.
Click to expand...


i was not addressing anyone in particular
neither did the observation by doreen which prompted my response

Doreen said:
let's look at the level of splitting hairs we've reached
Click to expand...

Gustav said:
:D




-----------------------------------


umm
about splitting hairs.........one or two is ok but interminably? why that is just downright disingenuous and trollish
Click to expand...


that line indicates that i had no further comment on your warning

so ahh
why so sensitive. were you splitting hairs? and thus my opinion on hair splitters cannot be allowed to stand? why that is downright fascist if that is really the case, ja?

grow a pair and stop being so goddamn needy
 
glaucon said:
No, actually, it's a simple matter of enforcing the rules.
Click to expand...


ah yes
the letter of the law rather than the spirit
right wing nazi pigs would be proud

heil!

so ah
can we think of real life laws that exist on the books but are rarely or never enforced? if sodomy laws still exist in some state statutes, will our resident nazi pigs go hunting hot babes that like it like that?

oh i got one....10 over the speed limit is the unspoken rule
there are of course a few anally retentive pigs that will pull your ass over
they are of course, few and far between

just like sci
casual and lax in the rules dept
until that that...glaucon fella happened by

/spits

oy, glaucon
that is an addled brained statement. y'know, stupid beyond belief

/shudders/cracks up
 
hello

the site is nice, i like it and the posts are nice and informative, i vote well and i will be around to see more and know you better!
 
Trippy said:
Clearly he is calling what S.A.M is calling for (S.A.M's idea) stupid, rather than calling S.A.M stupid, so he is, in fact, addressing the post, rather than addressing the poster.
Click to expand...


"by their fruits ye shall know them" - Matthew 7:16-20 (King James Version)


too complicated, trippy?

lets try again then......stupid is as stupid does - forrest gump

or something more relevant....stupid is as stupid says - gustav
 
Gustav said:
"by their fruits ye shall know them" - Matthew 7:16-20 (King James Version)


too complicated, trippy?

lets try again then......stupid is as stupid does - forrest gump

or something more relevant....stupid is as stupid says - gustav
Click to expand...

If you want to go through life assuming that only stupid people do stupid things go right ahead, that's your business, but don't bother bitching when people apply your model to you.

Personally, I prefer to give people the benefit of the doubt - If I assumed that everybody who did something stupid was stupid, and treated them as such, the world would be a very lonely place.
 
glaucon said:
Mod Note:

Ease off the abuse stateofmind.
That's twice now. Next time will not be tolerated.
Click to expand...

glaucon said:
There's no excuse for such abusive language and it violates Site Rules and Regulations.

fin
Click to expand...

glaucon said:

Fair enough. It just seemed to me that CC was offering a description, whereas stateofmind was being accusatory.

stateofmind, if I did misinterpret you, I do apologize.


But just to be clear: characterizing another member as a sociopath, or megalomaniac, etc., cannot be tolerated. If we're going to be discussing these pseudo-diagnoses, let's all be careful to make it clear that these terms aren't being directed at anyone in particular.
Click to expand...


so much for simply enforcing the rules

/snigger

incompetent moderation? selective enforcement?
i like to think so

i mean look how glaucon plays favorites

Crunchy Cat said:
Hmm. Quite simply, you are a sociopath
Click to expand...


glaucon said:

It just seemed to me that CC was offering a description,
Click to expand...

and i was not....

Gustav said:
neverfly
meet glaucon
our resident egomaniac

/chuckle
Click to expand...


..??

disgusting, ja?
i mean, imagine if doreen wasnt around to teach these things how to think

/shudder/cracks up
 
Trippy said:
Agreed.
Click to expand...


really?
you think your recipients are mirrored in sam's?

oh
when you say or do something stupid, you do not feel stupid?
perhaps this phrase might illuminate........."in that particular context, x is thick as a brick"
 
Last edited:
Gustav said:
seriously? why does the goddamn sentiment exist in the first place?
would you have agreed if sam thinks you needed xxl?
Click to expand...
I don't care if S.A.M thinks I need XXL, I agree with S.A.M's sentiment that there are posters on this forum that need them.

That's all S.A.M explicitly stated, and that's all I've explicitly agreed with.
 
fine
it is pathetic to see such an affinity for intellectually stunted thought processes
i guess you do what you can

/pats

run along, boy!
 
Gustav (abridged) said:
Woof woof woof

Meow meow
Click to expand...

Grow up and stop trolling (yes, I see a certain Irony here).

You bitch when people read too much into S.A.M's posts.
You bitch when people take S.A.M's posts at face value.

Seriously.

Just fuck off and stop wasting my time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top