The state, in this case Bush, says they are Christian. Jesus said his kingdom is not of this world, but the Roman Catholics then made the world to be the Kingdom of Jesus, which can not be found in the NT, and since then Presidents go on like the NT includes the Second Council, when it does not. By saying some of these things, where they are not found in the NT, then is to break the laws of the NT, and that makes one doers of lawlessness. I believe the state should protect its self, as it is a instrument of God, but where in the NT does it say the church is the state? The Second Council, and thereafter created that pattern, but it is not found in the NT. From the time of Moses, until false prophets enter Judaism, which happened right after Solomon died, there past 300 years. From the time of Jesus to the Second Council there past 295 years. In 2 Peter 2:1 he even prophesied on that event. IS Peter a false prophet, and it never happened, or did it happen pretty much as history has proven it happened in 325 AD? Don‘t you think Christianity is a game today, where words are tossed around, but facts prove things different? The founders of the US were Masons. They would not take communion with those professing to be Christians. They made the state, not Christians, but today Christians say they are the state. I think Christians are mixed up, and they don’t know their Bible, or their history, which has mislead many otherwise good people. Don’t you think maybe we should be Masons if we wish the best of both worlds? Can one say they can kill to defend if the state, when Jesus said you should not if a follower of Him, because one makes the excuse that the state can? How can you be the state and a Christian at the same time? Yes a Christian can be a soldier, and kill, and defend the state, but you can not be both. The founders knew it was an impossibility, but then they were geniuses. The founders said that the average person was not qualified to pick the correct president. Don‘t you think they proved to be correct?