Weren't mitochondria once a separate species which lived symbiotically with our genetic ancestors ?
So the theory goes.
Weren't mitochondria once a separate species which lived symbiotically with our genetic ancestors ?
So the theory goes.
Does that mean that what makes humans male rather than female was the introduction of a separate species genes.
Or does it mean that only male DNA carries the genes of the adopted organism.
This is a theory that very well proven.
Does that mean that what makes humans male rather than female was the introduction of a separate species genes.
Or does it mean that only male DNA carries the genes of the adopted organism.
You mean there is an abundance of evidence for it.
There is an abundance of evidence for evolution too.
And gravity.
.
However, the female in any species is defined by who produces eggs, and egg production is defined by the gamete that is big and has mitochondria in it. The reason why mitochondria aren't inherited patrilineally is mitochondria from the sperm, in almost all animals, is targeted for destruction by the egg after fertilization. Plants sometimes have patrilineal mitochondria, and it's speculated that it occurs very rarely in humans.
Any idea why the egg attacks the male mitochondria?
Exactly, now which do you see people more likely to say "there is much evidence for the existence of gravity" or "gravity is a proven force of nature"?
your insane, we are talking lay people not esoteric cosmologist!Recently? The former.