Dude,
But at least I'm not going to get sensitive about the criticism. I didn't know Satan was so sensitive.
Borehamg,
This was not an open letter about 18-21 year olds and development. That would be very short sighted of me. I was just talking about what is in this thread. If a 15 year old can perceive far more than I, so be it. I would rather learn from a 15 year old that can perceive far more than me, than from a 45 year old that thinks they know it all (when that aspect could be questionable).
Typing errors that occur is not something that is bad. As long as the concept is passed in its best form, that is fine. As long as one can understand what a person is really saying, spelling is completely unimportant. In this case, I was viewing it in conjunction with other aspects to come to a conclusion. Basically as evidence, not damnation of the spelling itself.
In regards to the rest of your message, I couldn't disagree, even if I wanted to. Good stuff.
But at least I'm not going to get sensitive about the criticism. I didn't know Satan was so sensitive.
Borehamg,
This was not an open letter about 18-21 year olds and development. That would be very short sighted of me. I was just talking about what is in this thread. If a 15 year old can perceive far more than I, so be it. I would rather learn from a 15 year old that can perceive far more than me, than from a 45 year old that thinks they know it all (when that aspect could be questionable).
Typing errors that occur is not something that is bad. As long as the concept is passed in its best form, that is fine. As long as one can understand what a person is really saying, spelling is completely unimportant. In this case, I was viewing it in conjunction with other aspects to come to a conclusion. Basically as evidence, not damnation of the spelling itself.
In regards to the rest of your message, I couldn't disagree, even if I wanted to. Good stuff.