Why should anyone take you seriously?
I'd say that is what's ridiculous. The point is about the inconsistency of many within the anti-abortion crowd.
I'm never particularly surprised at these sleights of rhetoric by conservatives. What I don't get, though, is whether we're supposed to take you seriously and believe you really are as stupid as you pretend, or remind you that if you're not going to take the issue seriously, there's no reason we should take you seriously.
And congratulations to you, Lou. You couldn't possibly be any more dishonest.
To reiterate a point: I'm never particularly surprised at these sleights of rhetoric by conservatives. What I don't get, though, is whether we're supposed to take you seriously and believe you really are as stupid as you pretend, or remind you that if you're not going to take the issue seriously, there's no reason we should take you seriously.
The issue pertains to another of your sleights of rhetoric:
If you're incapable of figuring out the difference, you should probably educate yourself a little better before taking part in the debate. As it is, all you're doing is embarrassing yourself and your anti-abortion colleagues.
Madanthonywayne said:
Now this is getting really ridiculous. You're saying that unless one is a pacifist, you can't be against murder?
I'd say that is what's ridiculous. The point is about the inconsistency of many within the anti-abortion crowd.
I'm never particularly surprised at these sleights of rhetoric by conservatives. What I don't get, though, is whether we're supposed to take you seriously and believe you really are as stupid as you pretend, or remind you that if you're not going to take the issue seriously, there's no reason we should take you seriously.
• • •
Dr. Lou Natic said:
And congratulations, that couldn't be more arbitrary.
Like I said, a distinction relavent to how valuable the organism's life is.
And congratulations to you, Lou. You couldn't possibly be any more dishonest.
To reiterate a point: I'm never particularly surprised at these sleights of rhetoric by conservatives. What I don't get, though, is whether we're supposed to take you seriously and believe you really are as stupid as you pretend, or remind you that if you're not going to take the issue seriously, there's no reason we should take you seriously.
The issue pertains to another of your sleights of rhetoric:
Lou: Explain to me the qualities a new born baby has that an unborn baby doesn't?
Tiassa: Independent existence.
Lou: I'm 24 and I'd say I'm just starting to reach the level of independent existence now, not completely just yet, let's not get carried away, but soon enough.
Tiassa: Independent existence.
Lou: I'm 24 and I'd say I'm just starting to reach the level of independent existence now, not completely just yet, let's not get carried away, but soon enough.
If you're incapable of figuring out the difference, you should probably educate yourself a little better before taking part in the debate. As it is, all you're doing is embarrassing yourself and your anti-abortion colleagues.