A world with a loving God.
- Thread starter Xelasnave.1947
- Start date
Not accepting Darwin’s theory of evolution, is not a religious pursuit. For some reason there are a lot of people claiming to be theists, who accept the idea.
Allowing has nothing to do with love, Jan. They are two different things. Again, check your dictionary to confirm.
You did.
Great, so God allows stuff to happen. Could you actually now provide and example of God's love? If not, and that's the only answer you can muster; "allowing", then I can conclude you have no examples of God's love.
How you know that, when scientists don’t know that?
Yeah, they do, Jan.
Children, Jan? That's where your argument lies, in the knowledge of children for scientific theories? Seriously?
Okay, did you know that children are introduced to evolution between the ages of 3-7 years old. In fact, a free book, "Grandmothers Fish" is available for kids to read. http://www.grandmotherfish.com/
So, if children at that age are beginning to understand (not believe) in evolution, what does that say about adults who couldn't be bothered to understand it, yet will sit there denying it?
Yes, but you didn't properly write your last post with clear definitions of words, but instead, you changed those words to mean something completely different. It boggles the mind that you continue to pursue an argument in such a way.
This again? Denying you said something where the words are right there for everyone to read?
Is that a joke? Do you seriously need a link to how the brain works?
Clearly, I think we're done here as you're just talking in circles now, but at the very least we have established that you cannot produce a single example of God's love.
My point is that some children accept the theory, but they have no clue as to why they accept it. Other than it’s trendy.
Most adults who accept it can only go as far as giving cliches, when asked why they accept it.
That type of indoctrination doesn’t surprise me at all, from that community.
I understand evolution more than you’d like to think. More than most non scientist kids and adults. But anyone who denies the naked emporers nakedness. I take my hat off to them.
It is an uphill task.
You did no such thing, Jan. You changed the meanings of words in a futile attempt to provide an example, but you clearly did not. And, unless you can show that the definitions of allow and love are the same, then the point stands. You failed.
That is entirely false.
Yet, another false statement.
Since you have yet to crack open a dictionary to find the meanings of the words allow and love, I'm quite sure you don't know the meaning of indoctrination, either. Your statement proves that.
You don't appear to understand it at all.
It’s not a pursuit but it’s often a view that is accepted by many religious fundamentalists. (refuting TOE)
Are you a monotheist? (if we were to label you lol)
Our kids know why.
Most adults think that seasons are caused by the earth moving closer to and farther away from the sun. That does not make that true. There is still an underlying truth.
From what you have posted on it so far, you understand less about evolution than most children.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Why?
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
Of course, it's irrefutably true. Ask them to make a choice and see which idea they give up.
I have shown you twice already. You're using the same tactic as you have on others where you claim you didn't say something, yet you did. Not only that, but your use of words and their meanings does not even agree with dictionaries, which is bizarre considering how easy it is to look up a words meaning, but you can't even be bothered to do that.
davewhite04
Valued Senior Member
Do you believe Jesus is God in the flesh?
davewhite04
Valued Senior Member