davewhite04
Valued Senior Member
I'm all three. Depends how I feel.Maybe you’re missing something.
I’m not dismissing your response. I respect your position. I respect most positions, be they genuinely atheist, agnostic, or theist.
I'm all three. Depends how I feel.Maybe you’re missing something.
I’m not dismissing your response. I respect your position. I respect most positions, be they genuinely atheist, agnostic, or theist.
"To our knowledge" being the keywords.Think about it though.
We both know what a human being is.
We would both question the validity of a human being if he/she could fly, outrun a lion, or breath in a vacuum. Why? Because we both know the there are no human beings, to our knowledge that can do that.
This planet can be paradise, probably the best planet for human life in the universe.
What chance is there of another planet exactly the same as this?
Do you like the variation of the species? This planet has potential, 80% of the water is unexlored, imagine how many cities could be built there? Once we have mastered recycling. The stars are nice to look at.
Depends what religion. I find religion puts God in a box, if we got rid of the religions who have confused everyone, then maybe it'll be easier to connect to God(God of the bible or source.
Think about it though.
We both know what a human being is.
We would both question the validity of a human being if he/she could fly, outrun a lion, or breath in a vacuum. Why? Because we both know the there are no human beings, to our knowledge that can do that.
A human being is complete, regardless of physical prowess. An incomplete human being can not exist. That’s what I mean by complete or incomplete.But, if human beings had wings, then that would be our knowledge of human beings and we would not question it. Regardless, it still does not negate or validate the concept of human beings being complete or incomplete.
Agreed."To our knowledge" being the keywords.
A human being is complete, regardless of physical prowess. An incomplete human being can not exist. That’s what I mean by complete or incomplete.
A complete human being, is a human being.I'm sorry Jan, but that doesn't explain what complete or incomplete means in regards to human beings. You need to justify the descriptions with details on what exactly is a complete human being and what exactly is an incomplete human being. You have not accomplished this as yet.
You age every day, so there is infinite complete human? Or are you complete when you're dead?A complete human being, is a human being.
An incomplete human being is not a human being.
If we get to the point where human beings can create a humanoid Android, with state of the art AI, to the point where we can’t readily tell the difference. That will not be a human being, even if we think it is.
A complete human being, is a human being.
An incomplete human being is not a human being.
If we get to the point where human beings can create a humanoid Android, with state of the art AI, to the point where we can’t readily tell the difference. That will not be a human being, even if we think it is.
Our design is perfectly complete.
That's a good example of "religious logic" for you.We’re all physically incomplete
Because I assume you know the difference.But Jan, that's like saying an apple is an apple and and orange is an orange without justifying what an apple is and what an orange is, or the differences between them.
Okay, but how does that show human beings are complete?
You’re a good example of stubbornness and pride.That's a good example of "religious logic" for you.
It’s the same with any material object (our human bodies). If they didn’t die, we wouldn’t be human.You age every day, so there is infinite complete human? Or are you complete when you're dead?
Yes it is. Nothing is complete because of the second law of thermodynamics.It’s the same with any material object (our human bodies). If they didn’t die, we wouldn’t be human.
The 2nd law of TD is a part of what makes it complete.Yes it is. Nothing is complete because of the second law of thermodynamics.
Explain your logic.The 2nd law of TD is a part of what makes it complete.
I already did. You said that human BODIES were perfect. Physical BODIES. Here's exactly what you said:You know exactly what I mean, and you cannot refute it
I have no problem with religion. I do have a problem with ignorance.but, because you think I’m religious, and you don’t like religion, you allow that to cloud your judgement, and bring conflict to the table.
He's exhibited it pretty well, I think. The second law of thermodynamics ensures nothing is complete, therefore it is complete, since "complete" = "not complete" in his logic.Explain your logic.
All things made of matter come into and go out of being. The human body is a thing. Therefore it comes into and goes out of being. If it didn’t, it wouldn’t be human. If it isn’t human, it’s not complete.Explain your logic.