"Modern cognitive science and neuroscience show that studying the role of emotion in mental function (including topics ranging from flashes of scientific insight to making future plans), that no human has ever satisfied this criterion, except perhaps a person with no affective feelings, for example an individual with a massively damaged amygdala or severe psychopathy. Thus, such an idealized form of rationality is best exemplified by computers, and not people. However, scholars may productively appeal to the idealization as a point of reference." [Wikipedia]
Where do you think the answer lies? Is it the internal vs. the external, your self-interest vs. others? Even selfishness is codependent. Self-love is even a chemical reaction, right? Rand and her lotus eaters, hah, that’s why I asked you if objectivists overestimated their independence from society? The internal and external are always interdependent.
Is love a reflection? Hmm…I don’t know. We do seem to seek ourselves in others, do we not?
"We're born alone, we live alone, and we die alone. Only through our love and friendship can we create the illusion for the moment that we're not alone."—Orson Welles
Well, you certainly can't escape by standing on the ledge gazing into the abyss, that’s for sure. You don't exist there.
Chemical reactions are real. However, love is fed by potentialities through our imagination. Maybe that's where the illusions lie.
But here's the kicker…the "self" that, too… is an illusion.
Ha-ha… funny, huh? :bugeye: