Bells
Staff member
You want a hanky to mop up your tears of sadness lou?
a nice thread for those of the spurious inclination..
- Thread starter The Devil Inside
- Start date
You want a hanky to mop up your tears of sadness lou?
Bells
Staff member
Globe artichokes!! With a nice garlic, vinegar and olive oil dipping sauce..
mmmmmm...
Sorry.. I have cravings at the moment.
Kittenses.
I though all straight guys wanted to mount her.
Pretty much...
Annointing her tongue with a cyanide capsule is the standard follow-up to that fantasy, though... just to maintain a pretense of "intellectual honesty"...
or something...
LoL
Oh ~!
I forgot !
Something nice...
Mashed 'taters & gravy !
mmm...!!!
awwww..you know im kidding!
*gives bells a peanut butter and banana sandwich*
Not even in repose, no. I wouldn't touch her with yours.I though all straight guys wanted to mount her.
mmmm, Killjoy, you say the nicest things..
with lumps.
thank you.
Playing with fire.
Genji.
But I have to thank you so much for the gay contribution.
I've always maintained a theory that the only guys who proclaim an attraction to women like anna nicole and other "baywatch" type chicks (even though she wasn't in baywatch, but you follow me, I hope), were gay.
There's a handful of notable women who are "every straight guy's fantasy" and my theory is only closet gays openly prescribe to being attracted to this fistful of women.
They don't actually ignite the testicles of a real hetero human being, they fit a robotic manufactured standard of "what makes a female attractive" according to some zany global poll.
Closet gay's in their adorable naivety are like "oh yeah dude, tell me about that pamela anderson/anna nicole dude, she is so hot I totally want to insert my penis into her... *dry reach* vagina", because they've heard her name mentioned as a sex symbol for straight guys.
Real hetero's really aren't interested in women that look like that.
Real hetero's "feel" which females are attractive to them, and it's practically impossible to quantify the qualities of a legitimately attractive woman, they pretty much arise at their own accord and they can easily contradict all of the "blonde and big boobs" rules, and equally blonde with big boobs women can be hideously unappealing- see gina lee nolin.
Sometimes you'll get a pale red head, whose slightly overweight, who is just really really really hot, extra feminine and cute with an overweightness which straps itself to all of the right places. She breaks these alleged rules and wins.
Then you get these lean tanned blondes with big jugs and you notice as a straight male that there's just something not there, they're just not naturally appealing to the hetero genitals
Closet homos can never identify these beacons of genuine hetero lust, they can only identify the women who fill out "the checklist" of "what's hot". It relies on a knowledge based criteria, so homos can learn it, they can't learn the real thing.
So as someone who sees it all I can tell when someone's a homo deep down aiming for these breast implanted tanned blondes.
They have no natural sense of what's attractive in a female which they can confidently rely on, so they tick off the boxes and make sure some hoe fits the bill of what a hetero "should" be attracted to.
It's so sad knowing that the reality will soon be widely known, and they sit there proudly with their oblivious fag hags.
Not at all.
But I have to thank you so much for the gay contribution.
I've always maintained a theory that the only guys who proclaim an attraction to women like anna nicole and other "baywatch" type chicks (even though she wasn't in baywatch, but you follow me, I hope), were gay.
There's a handful of notable women who are "every straight guy's fantasy" and my theory is only closet gays openly prescribe to being attracted to this fistful of women.
They don't actually ignite the testicles of a real hetero human being, they fit a robotic manufactured standard of "what makes a female attractive" according to some zany global poll.
Closet gay's in their adorable naivety are like "oh yeah dude, tell me about that pamela anderson/anna nicole dude, she is so hot I totally want to insert my penis into her... *dry reach* vagina", because they've heard her name mentioned as a sex symbol for straight guys.
Real hetero's really aren't interested in women that look like that.
Real hetero's "feel" which females are attractive to them, and it's practically impossible to quantify the qualities of a legitimately attractive woman, they pretty much arise at their own accord and they can easily contradict all of the "blonde and big boobs" rules, and equally blonde with big boobs women can be hideously unappealing- see gina lee nolin.
Sometimes you'll get a pale red head, whose slightly overweight, who is just really really really hot, extra feminine and cute with an overweightness which straps itself to all of the right places. She breaks these alleged rules and wins.
Then you get these lean tanned blondes with big jugs and you notice as a straight male that there's just something not there, they're just not naturally appealing to the hetero genitals
Closet homos can never identify these beacons of genuine hetero lust, they can only identify the women who fill out "the checklist" of "what's hot". It relies on a knowledge based criteria, so homos can learn it, they can't learn the real thing.
So as someone who sees it all I can tell when someone's a homo deep down aiming for these breast implanted tanned blondes.
They have no natural sense of what's attractive in a female which they can confidently rely on, so they tick off the boxes and make sure some hoe fits the bill of what a hetero "should" be attracted to.
It's so sad knowing that the reality will soon be widely known, and they sit there proudly with their oblivious fag hags.
pac man.
not missing DatGen.exe in my temp directory.
ugh.
ugh.
Ipharadisi
Registered Member
star gazin' whilst floating with Sir Render in the silken warmth of a balmy tropical (k)night's gentle swell...
:bugeye:
Chasing the Dragon.